Two Answers to Same Integral: Which One is Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter siresmith
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the integral from 0 to infinity of x squared times the exponential function exp(-2Bx squared). Participants express confusion over differing results obtained through integration by parts and a formula provided by a course lecturer.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the validity of integration by parts as a method for this integral and question whether it applies correctly. There are references to a standard integral formula and attempts to reconcile the two different answers obtained.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants sharing their attempts and questioning the correctness of their methods. Some have suggested using external tools for verification, while others are exploring different approaches, including the Feynman trick. There is no explicit consensus on which answer is correct.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention an upcoming exam, indicating a time constraint. There is also a reference to a classic integral result that may be relevant to the discussion.

siresmith
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
2 answers to same integral??!

Homework Statement



Ive been giong mental over this. There seems to be two different answers to the same integral. I can't work out which is correct.

Integral from 0 to infinity of:

x(squared) exp(-2Bx(squared))

Homework Equations



What is the right answer?

The Attempt at a Solution



Integration by parts gives the answer as: -1/2B

My course lecturer gives the answer as: (1/8B) x route of (pie/2B)

I think she must have used the general formula:

Integral from -infinity to + infinity of x(power2n)exp(-Ax(squared)) = [1x3x5...(2n-1)]x(pie/A)/2(powern)A(powern)

and divided it by 2 as we only want the integral from 0 to infinity.

Whos right?? Can anyone work this out?
Please! write it down and see if you get the answer i did by integration by parts. If you do, do you think the lecturer is wrong?

Please help, i have an important exam tomorrow!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, used the integrator and... It came out as the standard integral suggests.

But why ia the integration by parts method wrong?? I am sure i did it right. does integration by parts not work on certain functions or something weird like that? Or did i just get it wrong- what do you get?
 
siresmith said:
But why ia the integration by parts method wrong?? I am sure i did it right. does integration by parts not work on certain functions or something weird like that? Or did i just get it wrong- what do you get?
If you show us your working, perhaps we could point out where you've gone wrong.
 
Hi siresmith! :smile:

If you integrate \int x^2 e^{-2Bx^2} by parts,

you still end up with \int e^{-2Bx^2} … didn't you? :confused:
 
Feynman trick-- take the derivative of I with respect to B.

<br /> I= \int e^{-2Bx^2}<br />

If you know that integral already you will already be done. If not integrate your integral \frac{dI}{dB} by parts and to find it as an expression in terms of I. Solve the de by separating and integrating.

But you should already know what I is, it's a classic result and it must have been given to you.
 
I am right that in integration by parts you let u= x and dv= xe^{-Bx^2}?
 
Yup and the boundary term vanishes, the odd integral vanishes and you're left with something like I/2B.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K