Two axes in a problem, going from IJK to ijk

  • Thread starter Thread starter NEGATIVE_40
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Axes
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the correct interpretation of the unit vector \(\vec{K}\) in a three-dimensional coordinate system, specifically how it is expressed in terms of the unit vectors \(\vec{j}\) and \(\vec{k}\). The correct formulation is \(\vec{K} = \vec{j} \cos(\gamma) + \vec{k} \sin(\gamma)\), which aligns with the textbook's representation. The confusion arises from the orientation of the triangle used to derive the components of \(\vec{K}\), particularly the placement of the right angle in relation to the axes. The participant ultimately confirms that the textbook's approach is valid when the angle \(\gamma\) is positioned correctly between the Y and Z axes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of three-dimensional coordinate systems
  • Familiarity with unit vectors \(\vec{i}\), \(\vec{j}\), and \(\vec{k}\)
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions, specifically sine and cosine
  • Ability to interpret geometric diagrams in relation to vector components
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of unit vectors in three-dimensional space
  • Learn about vector projections and their applications in physics
  • Explore the concept of angles between axes in 3D geometry
  • Review trigonometric identities and their use in vector calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics or mathematics, particularly those focusing on vector analysis and three-dimensional geometry, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to unit vectors and their components.

NEGATIVE_40
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



*see attachment for diagram*
I'm having trouble understanding a step in an example problem.

"The Z-axis is vertical and carries the unit vector
\vec{K}=\vec{j}cos(\gamma)+\vec{k}sin(\gamma) "
is what I cannot understand.


The Attempt at a Solution



I want to split the K vector into components of j and k, I'm pretty sure.

If I try and do this (see attachment for my triangle), I get
\vec{K}=\vec{j}sin(\gamma)+\vec{k}cos(\gamma)
which is the opposite of what it should be.

Any help would be appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • IJK to ijk conversion.JPG
    IJK to ijk conversion.JPG
    11.6 KB · Views: 567
Physics news on Phys.org
Your formula can't right. To see this, try looking at the limiting cases. If gamma = 0, then K=j, if gamma = pi/2, then K=k.
 
Just thinking about this,

how do I know which way I should have the triangle going? For example, in the diagram I've attached, I have the 90 degree angle on the Y-axis. To get the answer it appears I should just do the opposite (always have 90 degree angle NOT on the IJK axes or parallel to them). That method seems to work, but I doubt that the correct way of thinking about it.

edit: ignore this. It doesn't work. If I have gamma between y and Z axes (the angle here would be gamma) with right angle along y, then I can get the textbook's solution. But then why doesn't this work if I have gamma between Y and z, with right angle along z ?
they seem to be saying the same thing.
 
Last edited:
phyzguy said:
Your formula can't right. To see this, try looking at the limiting cases. If gamma = 0, then K=j, if gamma = pi/2, then K=k.

Are you referring to the correct one given by my textbook?
\vec{K}=\vec{j}cos(\gamma)+\vec{k}sin(\gamma)

if gamma = 0 , then the axis xyz would be lined up so y corresponded to Z. That's exactly what the diagram is saying, so I don't see a problem with that. It's just how the textbook has the axis set up.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
3K