Two Balls Dropped: Separate or Together?

  • Thread starter Thread starter darkSun
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Balls
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the physics problem of two balls dropped one on top of the other. The initial assumption is that the bottom ball hits the ground first, allowing for a simplified analysis. Participants clarify that while both balls experience the same acceleration, treating them as separate for calculations does not affect the final result. The deformation of the balls during the impact is noted, but it is emphasized that this complexity does not change the outcome. Ultimately, the method of analyzing the situation in stages is justified as a practical approach.
darkSun
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Hello,

In this problem: http://www.physics.harvard.edu/academics/undergrad/probweek/prob1.pdf

Two balls are dropped, one on top of each other. When figuring out how high the top ball bounces, the solution assumes that the bottom ball hits the ground first, without the other ball on top of it.

I thought that ideally the two balls would stay on top of each other, since they experience the same acceleration, and would both "hit" at the same time. Is something wrong with my thinking?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
darkSun said:
I thought that ideally the two balls would stay on top of each other, since they experience the same acceleration, and would both "hit" at the same time. Is something wrong with my thinking?

Hello darkSun! :smile:

No, you're right …

but it doesn't make any difference to the result if we split the equations into two stages …

and since that's easier, that's exactly what we do! :wink:

(technically, of course, the balls deform, and the top of the lower ball doesn't "know" that the bottom has hit the ground until shortly afterwards!)
 
Oh, I see!

It really doesn't make a difference? Seems weird, but I'll try that.

Thank you for the help tiny-tim.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top