Two Blocks, a Pulley and an Inclined Plane

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving two blocks, a pulley, and an inclined plane, specifically focusing on the acceleration of the blocks. The equations of motion provided include components for both horizontal and vertical accelerations, highlighting the importance of correctly orienting the coordinate axes for Free Body Diagrams (FBDs). The participants emphasize that the magnitude of acceleration must be consistent across both blocks, and any misalignment in the equations can lead to incorrect conclusions. Ultimately, the correct approach involves ensuring that the acceleration components are accurately represented in the equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Second Law of Motion
  • Familiarity with Free Body Diagrams (FBDs)
  • Knowledge of vector components in physics
  • Basic principles of inclined planes and pulleys
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of equations for two-body systems involving pulleys
  • Learn about the implications of friction on inclined planes
  • Explore the concept of acceleration components in multi-directional motion
  • Review examples of solving physics problems with multiple masses and forces
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as anyone involved in solving complex motion problems involving multiple forces and components.

  • #31
rudransh verma said:
Ok!
##\frac{F_n\sin⁡α−m_2g}{m_2}=-ay##
##\frac{m_1g}{m_1}=ay=g##
I removed friction to simplify
One problem I've seen in multiple threads now is that you don't carefully define your variables. According to the equations you wrote down, mass 1 accelerates at 9.81 m/s^2. Is that what you really meant?

You have ##\vec a_1##, the acceleration of mass 1, and its components ##a_{1x}## and ##a_{1y}##. Same goes for mass 2. Try rewriting your equations carefully in terms of these variables. Then figure out which ones are zero, which components are equal, etc. Be able to justify everything.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
kuruman said:
This is hopelessly incorrect. You not only removed friction, but you also removed the tension which says that the mass is in free fall. Also, the vertical component of the acceleration for the mass on the incline does not have the same magnitude as the vertical component of the acceleration of the hanging mass. You cannot give them the same name.
OP has produced those equations excluding the string tension as a response my question in post #17.
Just trying to make him understand about the vertical acceleration of m2.
 
  • #33
Lnewqban said:
Just trying to make him understand about the vertical acceleration of m2.
So am I correct?
 
Last edited:
  • #34
Lnewqban said:
OP has produced those equations excluding the string tension as a response my question in post #17.
Just trying to make him understand about the vertical acceleration of m2.
I see. I misunderstood what OP was doing. I deleted my post to keep distractions to a minimum.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
  • #35
rudransh verma said:
What about assuming a particular direction and deciding by the value we get after calculation?
That’s what you said in some previous post.
Assuming a particular direction might work for some problems (e.g. zero friction). Maybe that's what you are referring to by 'some previous post'?

But I have definitely not said it in the context of this current thread. In Post #5 I simply suggested that you might want to check the direction. @kuruman explained the reason in Post#8.

Ignoring units: ##m_1=55## and ##m_2sinθ= 199sin(39.3°) =126##.
Since 126>55 we now know mass-2 moves downhill.
It took only a moment to find out!
 
  • #36
Steve4Physics said:
Ignoring units: m1=55 and m2sinθ=199sin(39.3°)=126.
Since 126>55 we now know mass-2 moves downhill.
It took only a moment to find out!
But they are not in opposite direction. How can you subtract them?
 
  • #37
rudransh verma said:
But they are not in opposite direction. How can you subtract them?
You do not need to subtract them. You just see which is biggest!

It's the same logic as described in Post #13 on your previous thread https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/two-bodies-hanging-from-pulley.1011640/
using the ‘Method 3’ approach.

Suppose you have two forces F1 and F2 applied to 2 (initially stationary) masses connected by a rope (represented as ======) all in straight line:

F1←[M1]=======[M2]→F2

The system accelerates left if F1>F2. (typo' corrected)
The system accelerates right if F2>F1. (typo' corrected)
(Assuming that |F1-F2| is sufficient to overcome any static limiting friction.)

Having the rope bent over a pulley doesn’t change this. The pulley changes the direction of the rope’s tension but not its magnitude. The pulley doesn’t affect in which sense acceleration occurs.

Edited -minor corrections.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: rudransh verma
  • #38
rudransh verma said:
So am I correct?
You are not correct. You have
##\frac{F_n\sin⁡α−m_2g}{m_2}=-ay##
##\frac{m_1g}{m_1}=ay=g##
If you replace the value of ##ay## from the second equation into the first, you get

##\dfrac{F_n\sin⁡α−m_2g}{m_2}=-g##
##F_n\sin⁡α−m_2g=-m_2g##
##F_n\sin⁡α=0##.

Does this last result look correct? What is the equation for Newton's 2nd law for ##m_2## when the string is cut, i.e. when you have a single block sliding on an incline?

If you insist on using vertical and horizontal axes, you need keep ypurself honest and start with different accelerations for each mass.
Let ##\vec a_1## = acceleration vector of mass 1.
Under the assumption that the hanging mass is moving up, ##\vec a_1=a_1~\hat y##.

Let ##\vec a_2## = acceleration vector of mass 2. If the hanging mass is moving up, then ##m_2## is moving down and to the right (according to your FBD) ##\vec a_2=a_2\cos\!\theta~\hat x -a_2\sin\!\theta ~\hat y##.
Because the string is inextensible, you have to set the magnitudes equal, ##a_1=a_2=a##. The acceleration vectors for each mass are
##\vec a_1= a~\hat y~~## and ##~~\vec a_2=a\cos\!\theta~\hat x -a\sin\!\theta ~\hat y##.
Note that the accelerations of two masses have the same magnitudes but different y-components. As you did in post #1 you have to write three equations and make sure that you use the correct expressions for the acceleration components on the right-hand side. That is why I gave them to you.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
  • #39
Edit: These diagrams have been corrected as per post #42 below.
Block 1.png


Block 2 on slope.png
Block 1+2 on slope.png
 
Last edited:
  • #40
kuruman said:
Note that the accelerations of two masses have the same magnitudes but different y-components.
##-T\cos\theta+F_N\sin\theta=m_2a\cos\theta##
##T\sin\theta+F_N\cos\theta-m_2g=-m_2a\sin\theta##
##T-m_1g=m_1a##
After removing friction I got these. I think I have done it correctly. The acceleration magnitude is same but different y components.
##a=\sqrt{(a\cos\theta)^2+(-a\sin\theta)^2}##
 
  • #41
Steve4Physics said:
The system accelerates left if F1>F2. (typo' corrected)
The system accelerates right if F2>F1. (typo' corrected)
(Assuming that |F1-F2| is sufficient to overcome any static limiting friction.)
And I thought the process of finding the direction would be a lengthy process. You sounded like that.
 
  • #42
Lnewqban said:
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/296694

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/296692

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/296696
I don't understand the FBDs in post #39. It seems that there is an internal contradiction. The FBD for the hanging mass shows tension T = m1 g up and weight m1 g down which implies that the net force on m1 is zero which means that m1 has zero acceleration. The "straightened" out diagram for the two-mass system shows net horizontal force to be Fnet = (1.23 - 0.56 - 0.54) N = 0.13 N. The contradiction that I see is that m1 is not accelerating while the system as a whole is. It can be fixed by writing T = m1(a+g) in the first FBD and recalculating its value after solving for the acceleration. Also, in the straightened out FBD there is a typo: mass m1 should be 0.55 kg, not 0.099 kg.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rudransh verma and Lnewqban
  • #43
kuruman said:
I don't understand the FBDs in post #39. ...
As usual, you are correct, professor.
I will try to correct the drawing tonight and edit that post.
Thank you!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kuruman
  • #44
@kuruman You didn’t answer. Am I right in post#40 ?
 
  • #45
rudransh verma said:
@kuruman You didn’t answer. Am I right in post#40 ?
Sorry, I didn't know you expected an answer from me. The equations in post #40 are correct but only if you are ignoring the friction between ##m_2## and the plane.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rudransh verma

Similar threads

Replies
46
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
862
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
13K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K