Two Lorentz Boosts Causing Rotation - Measurable w/ Gyroscope?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ookke
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lorentz Rotation
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
Ookke
Messages
172
Reaction score
0
It seems that combining two Lorentz boosts cause rotation:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_transformation#Composition_of_two_boosts

Do you think this rotation is something that could be measured by gyroscope? Or is it like space rotates around the accelerating observer, and the observer has no means to measure this rotation locally?

If I get this right, we could accelerate two observers differently so that they finally have the same velocity vector (and common rest frame), and their final orientation is not the same, although the initial orientation is. So the accelerations have somehow created a difference in orientation, but can we determine, which one of the observers has performed this rotation, or how this should be interpreted? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ookke said:
Do you think this rotation is something that could be measured by gyroscope?

Yes: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_precession

Ookke said:
So the accelerations have somehow created a difference in orientation, but can we determine, which one of the observers has performed this rotation, or how this should be interpreted?

Yes: just have each carry a gyroscope and see which one precesses relative to the distant stars, as well as by what angle, when they reconvene.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nugatory
Ok, nice. But if no single boost causes any rotation, why would two boosts in a row do that? It's like space remembers that we already had boost in one direction, and when we have another, this mysterious Thomas rotation takes place.

Maybe I'm thinking this rotation too literally. Assuming that we have sensitive enought test equipment, should we detect us turning in a rocket that first uses its rear engine, then its side engine? At which point we should expect to detect this turning, if at all?