Two questions about SUSY [Greene's book]

  • Thread starter Thread starter Golfer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Susy
Golfer
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Greene in "The Fabric of the Cosmos" discusses supersymmetry. On pages 264-5, he states:"...before the Higgs ocean formed, not only did all force particles have identical masses - zero - but the photons and W and Z particles were identical in essentially every other way also as well...At high enough temperatures, that is, the Higgs ocean evaporates; as it does, the disctinction between the weak and electromagnetic forces evaporates, too." My first question is: If the temperature is high enough, will the distinction between gravity and the other forces also evaporate?

On page 355, he states:"...Ramond's research...revealed a perfect balance - a novel symmetry - between the vibrational patterns with different spins in the modified string theory. These researchers found that the new vibrational patterns arose in pairs whose spin values differed by half a unit. For every vibrational pattern with spin-1/2, there was an associated vibrational pattern with spin-0. For every vibrational pattern of spin-1, there was an associated vibrational pattern of spin-1/2, and so on." My second question is: The graviton is presumed to have a vibrational pattern with spin-2. Has the associated vibrational pattern with spin-3/2 been derived from string theory?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the temperature is high enough, will the distinction between gravity and the other forces also evaporate?

Yes, I think if you believe in unification then this is the correct picture.

The graviton is presumed to have a vibrational pattern with spin-2. Has the associated vibrational pattern with spin-3/2 been derived from string theory?

Yes---string theory contains the spin-3/2 particle, called the gravitino.
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
Back
Top