Two spheres collide and assume that the collision is perfectly elastic

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the relationship for perfectly elastic collisions between two spheres, emphasizing the conservation of linear momentum and kinetic energy. The initial attempt involves analyzing the velocities of the spheres relative to each other, leading to the equation m_a*v_a + m_b*v_b = m_a*v_a' + m_b*v_b'. The key point is recognizing that the final velocities are opposite in direction, resulting in the equation (va' - vb') dot N = -(va - vb) dot N. The successful derivation is achieved by solving the equations in the center of mass frame, which simplifies the calculations. The discussion concludes with the affirmation that both kinetic energy and momentum conservation principles are crucial for understanding elastic collisions.
nullspace7
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Two spheres collide and assume that the collision is perfectly elastic. Also --only linear momentum.

I have the relationship:

(va' - vb') dot N = -(va - vb) dot N

Where N is the normal vector at the point of collision. va and vb are initial velocities of object A and B, respectively. And va' and vb' are the final velocities of object A and B respectively.

I want to know how this relationship is derived.

This is what I try:

Relative to object B, object A has velocity v_ab. Relative to object B,
object B has velocity 0.

m_a*v_a + m_b*v_b = m_a*v_a' + m_b*v_b'

Relative to B:

m_a*v_ab + 0= m_a*v_ab' + 0

v_ab = v_ab'

That would give me this: (va' - vb') dot N = (va - vb) dot N

But I am missing the negative sign, because they should be opposite. Please
advise. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As I'm sure you're aware, in an elastic collision, both kinetic energy and momentum are conserved. If you write both sets of equations and solve them simultaneously, you'll get (va' - vb') = - (va - vb)
 
Yeah (needed KE), I've solved it now. I solved it in the center of mass frame, which seemed easier.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top