Two types of electrical charge?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the existence of only two types of electrical charge: positive and negative, with some mention of neutral charge. Participants question the possibility of multiple charge types with only two interaction types, highlighting that no evidence has been found to support this since the search was halted in 1947. The conversation also touches on charge conservation, explaining that while total charge is conserved, individual counts of positive and negative charges can change during reactions, such as in the decay of copper-64. It is noted that interactions between charges, like electron-positron pairs, demonstrate that changes in charge counts occur simultaneously. Overall, the principles of electrodynamics and charge conservation remain central to understanding electrical charge behavior.
kindlychung
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Why are we so sure that there are only two types of electrical charge?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because we have look far and wide, and only found two. (or three if you count neutral :) )
 
How far and how wide?
Is it possible to have multiple types of charge only two types of interaction between them?
 
kindlychung said:
How far and how wide?
Is it possible to have multiple types of charge only two types of interaction between them?

Actually we called off the search on October 3, 1947. Budget ran out and they instead decided to pass it over to the search for the 16th way that you can make an Upside-down Pineapple Cake.

If there were multiple types of charge and they only interacted in two ways, then what would differentiate the types of charges? Electrodynamics is a theory that explains the behavior of the electromagnetic force. If you add redundant elements to this theory, how would you change anything?
 
There are also quark charges, ±1e/3 and ±2e/3, but quarks are very short-lived.

Bob S
 
im having this doubt.. why is that 'total' charge is conserved...why don't we have all negative and all positive charge conserved...ie say total negative charges pre and post a reaction should be the same rt ?
 
ravisastry said:
im having this doubt.. why is that 'total' charge is conserved...why don't we have all negative and all positive charge conserved...ie say total negative charges pre and post a reaction should be the same rt ?
Separately conserving positive charge (protons) and negative charge (electrons) is not observed in nature. Consider for example, the radioactive isotope copper-64 (an odd-odd nucleus with 29 protons). Sometimes it decays by beta- (electron) decay to a zinc isotope (30 protons), sometimes by beta+ (positron) decay to a nickel isotope (28 protons), and sometimes by capturing an atomic electron (in the K-shell) to become a nickel isotope. So sometimes the number of positive charges increases, and sometimes decreases. The number of negative charges (electrons) changes accordingly. The only observed conserved quantities are baryon numbers (neutrons + protons), lepton numbers (charged leptons + neutrinos), and total charge. This is even true when antiparticles (like antiprotons) are involved.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copper-64

Bob S
 
Last edited:
ravisastry said:
im having this doubt.. why is that 'total' charge is conserved...why don't we have all negative and all positive charge conserved...ie say total negative charges pre and post a reaction should be the same rt ?

An electron and positron can both vanish together. Or, a pair can be created. Clearly, both kinds of charges' counts change. But they always change together.
 
Back
Top