Two velocities, unknown: height, mass, theta HELP

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a block sliding down a ramp, where the speeds at two points, A and B, are given for two trials. The key approach is to apply the conservation of mechanical energy, using the equation that relates gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. It is noted that the mass of the block is irrelevant in this scenario, and the absence of friction allows for constant acceleration. The participants conclude that the difference in gravitational potential energy between points A and B remains the same for both trials, leading to the implication that the change in kinetic energy must also be equal. This realization simplifies the problem significantly, highlighting the elegance of energy conservation principles in mechanics.
rmunoz
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A block is sent sliding down a ramp. Its speeds at points A and B are 1.85 m/s and 2.60 m/s, respectively. Next, it is again sent sliding down the ramp, but this time its speed at point A is 3.95 m/s. What then is its speed at point B?

(point a is logically higher on the ramp than point b)

Homework Equations



The goal of this one is to use conservation of mechanical energy to deduce the final velocity of the second trial. Heres what i have:

since this is clearly a problem that does not need to involve the mass in the mechanical energy equation, i set something up that should describe the motion and the change in kinetic energy of this object:

gh(initial) + (v(initial)^2)/2 = gh(final) + (v(final)^2)/2

This should be set up twice (once for each set of velocities, the second set containing an unknown velocity for vfinal.)

What I'm confused about is how the kinetic energy and work equations come into play if at all. There is clearly no frictional force acting on the block so the acceleration is constant. Where do i go from here? Anybody have a suggestion on how to tackle the heights or weather or not it is necessary to find those quantities? i assume it is but i could very well be wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider the difference in gravitational potential (A to B) between the two runs.

Won't that necessarily be the same for both runs?

So doesn't that imply the difference in kinetic energy must also be the same?
 
wow...thats deathly simple. As usual, the hardest problems take the least amount of time... if you know what your doing!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top