Two wheels and angular acceleration

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two wheels connected by a belt, where the angular acceleration of the first wheel is given, and the goal is to determine the time required for the second wheel to reach a specified angular speed. The context includes concepts of angular velocity, linear velocity, and the relationship between the two wheels through their radii.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the angular velocities and linear velocities of the two wheels, questioning the application of kinematic equations in this context. There is an exploration of converting angular speed from revolutions per minute to radians per second and the implications of using the provided angular acceleration.

Discussion Status

Some participants have shared their calculations and reasoning, while others have requested clarification on specific steps. There appears to be a productive exchange of ideas, with some participants affirming the validity of the approaches taken.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that the belt does not slip, which is crucial for the relationship between the linear speeds of the wheels. There is also a focus on ensuring that the angular acceleration provided is correctly integrated into their calculations.

rosstheboss23
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Two wheels and angular acceleration

Homework Statement


In the figure below, wheel A of radius rA = 11 cm is coupled by belt B to wheel C of radius rC = 25 cm. The angular speed of wheel A is increased from rest at a constant rate of 1.6 rad/s2. Find the time needed for wheel C to reach an angular speed of 120 rev/min, assuming the belt does not slip. Linear speeds of two rims must be equal.



Homework Equations


v=wr; a= w(squared)r



The Attempt at a Solution


v=wr so v1=v2? Then I tried to use this equation w(squared)r=a And then tried using the angular acceleration equations(that are like the kineticmatics equations). The answers I got using these equations though I think should be wrong because the acceleration is give above. Can someone help explain the concept. I can do the brute work if I know.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rosstheboss23 said:
v=wr so v1=v2? Then I tried to use this equation w(squared)r=a And then tried using the angular acceleration equations(that are like the kineticmatics equations). The answers I got using these equations though I think should be wrong because the acceleration is give above. Can someone help explain the concept. I can do the brute work if I know.
Hey ross,

I'm not quite sure what your saying here, could you show your steps explicitly?
 
I assumed that velocity was the same for both around the wheels so since the v is the same for w1r1 and w2r2 where w2 is equal to 120rev/min which I convert to roughly 13 rad/s. The radii for both equations are given to be .11m for r1 and .25m for r2 so I solved for equation v2=w2r2 by plugging in 13(.25) and got roughly 3.25 m/s which I used for v1 and solved for angular speed in v1=w1r1. The angular speed for this I got to be roughly around 30rad/s. Then I used the kinematics equation V= Vo +at using 30rad/s for V and 0 for Vo and then for acceleration the 1.6 rad/s(squared) provided. Does this sound like a legitimate way of trying to solve the problem?
 
rosstheboss23 said:
I assumed that velocity was the same for both around the wheels so since the v is the same for w1r1 and w2r2 where w2 is equal to 120rev/min which I convert to roughly 13 rad/s. The radii for both equations are given to be .11m for r1 and .25m for r2 so I solved for equation v2=w2r2 by plugging in 13(.25) and got roughly 3.25 m/s which I used for v1 and solved for angular speed in v1=w1r1. The angular speed for this I got to be roughly around 30rad/s. Then I used the kinematics equation V= Vo +at using 30rad/s for V and 0 for Vo and then for acceleration the 1.6 rad/s(squared) provided. Does this sound like a legitimate way of trying to solve the problem?
Your method looks spot on too me :approve:
 
Good. Thanks a lot. I appreciate your help.
 
rosstheboss23 said:
Good. Thanks a lot. I appreciate your help.
A pleasure :smile:

Don't forget to mark the thread as solved when your done, thanks.
 

Similar threads

Replies
67
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K