Ultra-Dense Deuterium: Is it Useful for Spacecraft?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sanman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Deuterium
sanman
Messages
737
Reaction score
24
Has anybody ever heard of this stuff?

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/05/090511181356.htm

So far, only microscopic amounts of the new material have been produced.

Okay, so that means it has at least been produced, so it exists. But is it stable once the confinement pressure has been removed, or is it just a fleeting substance? For it to be feasible as a fuel, I'd imagine it has to be a stable, persistent material.

Could it be useful for powering spacecraft one day? Presumably its compact mass density would allow for a lot of fuel within a small volume.

Is there any danger that such a high-density material could somehow chain-react, or spontaneously explode due to entropy pressures?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not a hint in that article as to how this dense deuterium was produced.
 
Last edited:
Right now, it sounds like "cold fusion" deja vu. I once accidentally froze both the fill line and the vent line on a liquid deuterium target. It finally exploded, due to pressure build up, and filled the whole accelerator complex with about 2 torr of deuterium gas. So beware of frozen deuterium.
 
Last edited:
ScienceDaily said:
Imagine a material so heavy that a cube with sides of length 10 cm weights 130 tonnes, a material whose density is significantly greater than the material in the core of the Sun.

The article doesn't make it sound like a Bose Einstein condensate.

Can diamond anvil cells achieve this density??

If so, how is could be a big item. Hasn't anyone bothered to stick some deuterium under an anvil until now?

If it's an anvil the diamond faces could aford a path to trigger a possible fusion reaction via laser. No need to remove the pressure for that.

Edit: Wikipedia quotes 25 x 1015 Pascals as the (calculated) pressure at the core of the sun.
Answers.com gives 300 gigaPascals as the pressure achievable by a daimond anvil.
 
Last edited:
the core of the sun is also a lot hotter.

somebody said that either metallic hydrogen or metallic helium might be a room temperature superconductor. can't remember which.
 
Supposedly it's 'Rydberg matter'. Which I haven't really heard about before, and which it seems few others have either, except this Holmlid guy. (who's Prof of Atmospheric Chemistry - what?)

And he, in turn, seems to have heard all about it in spades.

I'm skeptical. As I would be about any new state of matter only one guy has ever seen.
 
Yes granpa, but I've not seen any mention of this (or a the justification for why it's supposedly so stable) in established literature, and I've got a whole office full of chemical physics books.

A rather inordinate amount of references on the Wikipedia page are to articles by this very same Holmlid guy.
 
actually my point was that rydberg matter should be less dense than ordinary matter. not more dense.
(although, I guess its possible that the outer electrons could be both degenerate and in large-n orbitals at the same time).

edit:or maybe they are necessarily degenerate (metal-like) BECAUSE they are so large and diffuse. in which case Rydberg matter could be more dense than ordinary matter.

http://www2.chem.gu.se/staff/leif_holmlid.html
In principle, Rydberg Matter is a condensed metallic[/color] phase formed from weakly interacting Rydberg species (Rydberg states).
The lowest state of Rydberg Matter in excitation state n = 1 can only be formed from hydrogen (protium and deuterium) atoms and is designated H(1) or D(1). This is dense or metallic hydrogen[/color], which we have studied for a few years. The bond distance is 153 pm (1.53 angstroms) (picometer, one thousand times smaller than a nanometer), or 2.9 times the Bohr radius. It is a quantum fluid, with a density of approximately 0.6 kg / dm3. (0.6 grams/cc or 0.6 times as dense as water and 8.5 times as dense as liquid hydrogen which has a density of 0.071 g/cc)

A much denser state exists for deuterium, named D(-1). We call it ultra-dense deuterium. This is the inverse of D(1)[/color], and the bond distance is very small, equal to 2.3 pm (0.023 angstroms). Its density is extremely large, >130 kg / cm3 (130,000 times as dense as water), if it can exist as a dense phase. Due to the short bond distance, D-D fusion is expected to take place easily in this material.edit:he just seems to be calling 'degenerate matter' 'rydberg matter'. which in a sense, if all rydberg matter is metal-like, it is.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VND-4VP66CS-4&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=ec9093be8b72a328c121a8092c95ac67
This material is probably an inverted metal[/color] with the deuterons moving in the field from the stationary electrons, which gives a predicted interatomic distance of 2.5 pm, close to the measured value. Thus, we prove that an ultra-dense deuterium material exists.edit:why would the electrons be stationary?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
  • #11
Last edited:
  • #12
granpa said:
A much denser state exists for deuterium, named D(-1). We call it ultra-dense deuterium. This is the inverse of D(1)[/color], and the bond distance is very small, equal to 2.3 pm (0.023 angstroms). Its density is extremely large, >130 kg / cm3 (130,000 times as dense as water), if it can exist as a dense phase. Due to the short bond distance, D-D fusion is expected to take place easily in this material.
Why not put negative muons in it. They will pull the deuterium nuclei close enough together to catalyze fusion before the muon decays. Multiple muon catalysis by a single muon has been observed in deuterium bubble chambers, density 0.16 grams per cc. Maybe muons could catalyze 100's? or 1000s? in this ultradense phase before the muon decays. See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon-catalyzed_fusion
http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PR/v106/i2/p330_1
Uploaded photo (jpg) of two catalysis D-D fusions by single muon in bubble chamber.
 

Attachments

  • Muon double catalysis.jpg
    Muon double catalysis.jpg
    32.9 KB · Views: 1,238
Last edited:
  • #13
Yes, but this ultra-dense deuterium is said to be Rydberg Matter, with unique electronic orbitals. Who knows if muons and muonic orbitals are compatible with this?

The other thing, is that they're comparing this matter to water droplets in a cloud, and saying that it's not stable for very large crystal sizes, and that the largest cluster of such matter has been counted at 91 atoms. That's too low for muon-catalyzed fusion breakeven.
 
  • #14
the reason its unstable might just be charge. the nuclei are close together but the eletrons are in very large orbits. too many nuclei and they start repelling one another electrically.

but I'm just guessing.
 
  • #15
granpa's wikipedia link, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rydberg_matter, claims that Rydberg matter is formed in small hexagonal, planar units of a few atoms and would occur as a condensate within the gases state of the material.

Maybe a substrate could encourage its formation under different conditions.But it would take a heck of a lot of muons, all in the same place, to the exclusion of electrons to get a muon structure to form instead.
 
Last edited:
  • #16
So something I need to understand here -- the nuclei are closer to each other, but the electrons have a large-radius planetary-style orbit, which means that the atoms are roughly pancake-shaped? And so these atoms stack like pancakes to achieve the high density, or do they attach in some different way, like flat floor tiles?
 
  • #17
the nuclei are within the orbits of each others electrons. (like in a metal)

a whole cluster might be smaller than the orbit of one of its atoms outer electron. that's why I think electronic repulsion might be the limiting factor in how big it gets.
 
Last edited:
  • #18
Phrak said:
granpa's wikipedia link, Maybe a substrate could encourage i...wo catalytic fusions in about 2 microseconds.
 
Last edited:
  • #19
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VND-4VP66CS-4&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=ec9093be8b72a328c121a8092c95ac67

This material is probably an inverted metal with the deuterons moving in the field from the stationary electrons,

not sure what he's talking about but it sounds similar to the impression that a supersolid would give.
 
Last edited:
  • #20
So you're saying that the electronic shells are tightly locked together in stationary positions, so that the nuclei inside are the ones which are vibrating instead? Is that even possible? Isn't that like the tail wagging the dog?
 
  • #21
the article states that the nuclei are flowing while the electrons are locked into a lattice. what I'm saying is that maybe its just a supersolid instead. in effect the 'effective mass' of the solid is less than its normal mass. maybe zero, who knows.
 
  • #22
would that mean that ultradense deuterium (and possibly therefore metallic hydrogen) is a perfect supersolid?
 
Last edited:
  • #23
Bob S said:
Actually not. A single negative muon quickly penetrates the electron cloud and forms a muonic deuterium atom, with a Bohr radius about 206 times smaller than the normal deuterium atom. This neutral atom then goes around inside the electrons and bumps into another deuterium nucleus, and forms a deuterium molecular ion. The separation of deuterium neuclei in this ion is then close enough to produce fusion within several microseconds. The bubble chamber photo I posted above shows two catalytic fusions in about 2 microseconds.
Yes but to what end, given the 6GeV required to create the muon?
 
  • #24
granpa said:
actually my point was that rydberg matter should be less dense than ordinary matter. not more dense.
(although, I guess its possible that the outer electrons could be both degenerate and in large-n orbitals at the same time).

edit:or maybe they are necessarily degenerate (metal-like) BECAUSE they are so large and diffuse. in which case Rydberg matter could be more dense than ordinary matter.

http://www2.chem.gu.se/staff/leif_holmlid.html
In principle, Rydberg Matter is a condensed metallic[/color] phase formed from weakly interacting Rydberg species (Rydberg states).
The lowest state of Rydberg Matter in excitation state n = 1 can only be formed from hydrogen (protium and deuterium) atoms and is designated H(1) or D(1). This is dense or metallic hydrogen[/color], which we have studied for a few years. The bond distance is 153 pm (1.53 angstroms) (picometer, one thousand times smaller than a nanometer), or 2.9 times the Bohr radius. It is a quantum fluid, with a density of approximately 0.6 kg / dm3. (0.6 grams/cc or 0.6 times as dense as water and 8.5 times as dense as liquid hydrogen which has a density of 0.071 g/cc)

A much denser state exists for deuterium, named D(-1). We call it ultra-dense deuterium. This is the inverse of D(1)[/color], and the bond distance is very small, equal to 2.3 pm (0.023 angstroms). Its density is extremely large, >130 kg / cm3 (130,000 times as dense as water), if it can exist as a dense phase. Due to the short bond distance, D-D fusion is expected to take place easily in this material.edit:he just seems to be calling 'degenerate matter' 'rydberg matter'. which in a sense, if all rydberg matter is metal-like, it is.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VND-4VP66CS-4&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=ec9093be8b72a328c121a8092c95ac67
This material is probably an inverted metal[/color] with the deuterons moving in the field from the stationary electrons, which gives a predicted interatomic distance of 2.5 pm, close to the measured value. Thus, we prove that an ultra-dense deuterium material exists.
Bob S said:
A single negative muon quickly penetrates the electron cloud and forms a muonic deuterium atom, with a Bohr radius about 206 times smaller than the normal deuterium atom

ultradense deuterium is 209 (incorrect. I goofed) times smaller than normal deuterium (which I assume to be the same size as hydrogen) according to my calculations and the rounded numbers given in the article.

density of deuterium=2 * density of hydrogen= 0.142
density of ultradense deuterium=130,000
density of ultradense deuterium/density of deuterium=130,000/0.142=915,492.95
radius of deuterium/radius of ultradense deuterium=cube root of 915,492.95=97.1[/color]

whoops. I entered 9,000,000 instead of 900,000
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #25
mheslep said:
Yes but to what end, given the 6GeV required to create the muon?
It takes about 6 GeV minimum to produce an antiproton. Muons come from pion decay (as well as from other sources), and pions can be produced by about (I forget exactly) about 300 MeV protons. I mentioned muons because thay can catalyze d-d fusion by getting the two deuterons roughly 10 times closer (hence 100 times volumetrically) than ultra-dense deuterium. Muon-catalyzed fusion is "exothermic" (energy out > energy in) only if a single muon can catalyze 100's (1000's?) of fusions.
 
  • #26
getting the two deuterons roughly 10 times closer (hence 100 times volumetrically) than ultra-dense deuterium.

how did you calculate that? I think it should be twice as close. but I'm not sure.
 
Last edited:
  • #27
Bob S said:
It takes about 6 GeV minimum to produce an antiproton. Muons come from pion decay (as well as from other sources), and pions can be produced by about (I forget exactly) about 300 MeV protons. I mentioned muons because thay can catalyze d-d fusion by getting the two deuterons roughly 10 times closer (hence 100 times volumetrically) than ultra-dense deuterium. Muon-catalyzed fusion is "exothermic" (energy out > energy in) only if a single muon can catalyze 100's (1000's?) of fusions.
No more than 200 reactions are expected because of the alpha 'sticking' problem (0.5% chance) that Jackson identified in the 1957 paper. If that problem could be solved then we'd have ~440 fusions before the muon decays (5ns per fusion, 2.2 us decay). Then throw away 2/3 of that energy in the heat cycle to produce useful power.

The production energy tally for muons made from pions is something like:
  • Made from pi, pi rest mass 139 MeV
  • Other things unavoidably made at the same time x10
  • Lab vs CM frame x2
  • Accelerator efficiency x2
Total: ~5 GeV

Brunelli & Leotta (eds.), Muon-Catalyzed Fusion and Fusion with Polarized Nuclei (Plenum Press, 1987)
TH Rider "http://www.longwood.edu/chemistry/Students/indstud/FusionRoute.pdf" ", April 1, 2005, slide 10
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #28
[Bob S]
I mentioned muons because thay can catalyze d-d fusion by getting the two deuterons roughly 10 times closer (hence 100 times volumetrically) than ultra-dense deuterium.
granpa said:
how did you calculate that? I think it should be twice as close. but I'm not sure.
Using your density, the deuterons are 97.1 times closer. The muonic deuterium is 206 times closer, say a factor of two better than ultradense deuterium. So the muonic deuterium volumetric wave function overlap is a factor of 8 better.
 
  • #29
mheslep said:
No more than 200 reactions are expected because of the alpha 'sticking' problem (0.5% chance) that Jackson identified in the 1957 paper. If that problem could be solved then we'd have ~440 fusions before the muon decays (5ns per fusion, 2.2 us decay). Then throw away 2/3 of that energy in the heat cycle to produce useful power.

The production energy tally for muons made is something like:
  • Made from pi, pi rest mass 139 MeV
  • Other things unavoidably made at the same time x10
  • Lab vs CM frame x2
  • Accelerator efficiency x2
Total: ~5 GeV

Brunelli & Leotta (eds.), Muon-Catalyzed Fusion and Fusion with Polarized Nuclei (Plenum Press, 1987)
TH Rider "http://www.longwood.edu/chemistry/Students/indstud/FusionRoute.pdf" ", April 1, 2005, slide 10
I disagree with some of your efficiencies, but you did not specifically include that only about 1/3 of the pions are negative pions, which beget negative muons. We were producing zillions of pions at the 184" cyclotron, but the pions have to decay to muons before the beamline ends, because a stopped pi-minus will form a pionic atom in 10-12 sec and react with a single deuteron, probably pi-minus + proton -> neutron + either pi-zero or gamma (Panofsky ratio = 1.55)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #30
Bob S said:
I disagree with some of your efficiencies, but you did not specifically include that only about 1/3 of the pions are negative pions, which beget negative muons.
That's part of the x10. Everything that is not a negative muon at the end of the chain and has taken up energy as part of the acceleration and collision is wasted energy, and part of the 5 or 6 GeV required to create the negative muon.
 
  • #31
Hi All

Mystery of the ultra-dense deuterium is (partly) explained in this paper...

"[URL deuterium of Rydberg matter clusters for inertial
confinement fusion targets[/URL]

...which explains the ultra-density is achieved inside a metal lattice. Unsure just how 'big' the ultra-dense deuterium clusters can get, but fuel-pellet sized might be doable.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #32
I notice in that paper they mention metal oxides like palladium and lithium in particular.
Could the existence of ultra-dense deuterium clusters be the reason for speculative evidence about cold fusion phenomena allegedly observed in connection with palladium?

Any ideas?
 
  • #33
sanman said:
I notice in that paper they mention metal oxides like palladium and lithium in particular.
Could the existence of ultra-dense deuterium clusters be the reason for speculative evidence about cold fusion phenomena allegedly observed in connection with palladium?

Any ideas?

The researchers associated with Holmlid on that paper have published work on Low Energy Nuclear Reactions ("cold fusion") so my guess is probably. Doesn't make it 'cranky' or 'pseudoscience' as they're all hard-nose experimentalists, not know-it-all armchair analysts.

Of course the whole LENR phenomena is still sub judice but if there's anything to it then these guys would know.
 
  • #34
So then it's a matter of trying to maximize the occurrence of these nano-clusters in the metallic oxide lattice, and seeing if this increases any "cold fusion" readings.

Hmm, I wonder if I should consider buying stock in palladium? Even lithium seems to be in precious short supply, with most of it coming from Bolivia.
 
  • #35
sanman said:
... Even lithium seems to be in precious short supply, with most of it coming from Bolivia.
There's plenty Li. The cheapest supply comes from S. America, but there other large sources including the US.
 
  • #36
What factors and processes govern the formation of these nano-clusters? Do the location and occurrence of these nano-clusters correlate with anything? I'm just wondering how to encourage and maximize their formation. If they could be created more prolifically, then this could be revolutionary.
 
  • #37
George H. Miley is working on this area along with Holmid...

Ultrahigh-density deuterium of Rydberg matter clusters for inertial confinement fusion targets
http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=6056192

Clusters of condensed deuterium of densities up to 10^29 cm−3 in pores in solid oxide crystals were confirmed from time-of-flight mass spectrometry measurements. Based on these facts, a schematic outline and possible conclusions of expectable generalizations are presented, which may lead to a simplification of laser driven fusion energy including new techniques for preparation of targets for application in experiments of the NIF type, but also for modified fast igniter experiments using proton or electron beams or side-on ignition of low compressed solid fusion fuel.

"Ultra high density deuterium clusters for low energy nuclear reactions"
http://abstracts.acs.org/chem/239nm/program/view.php?obj_id=10048&terms=

"Our low energy nuclear reaction research (LENR) has embedded ultra high density deuterium “clusters” (D cluster) in Palladium (Pd) thin films. These clusters approach metallic conditions, exhibiting super conducting properties. [1] They represent “nuclear reactive sites” needed for LENR. The resulting reactions are vigorous, giving the potential for a high power density cell. Clusters are achieved through electrochemically loading-unloading deuterium into a thin metal palladium film creating local defects which form a strong potential trap where deuterium condenses into “clusters” of ~100 atoms. Research now focuses on nano-manufactured structures to achieve a high volumetric density of these trap sites. Alternately condensed deuterium inverted Rydberg 2.3-pm deuteron spacing is being studied. [2]

---

This parallels Arata's work, in which he speaks of "pynco-deuterium lumps" and "solid deuterium" at room temperature in lattices
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=arata+deuterium

http://www.journalarchive.jst.go.jp/english/jnlabstract_en.php?cdjournal=pjab1977&cdvol=78&noissue=3&startpage=57
"It seems that nuclear fusion in solid (“solid fusion”) takes place in the highly condensed “deuterium-lump”inside each unit cell of the“metallic deuterium lattice” (or mixed hydrogen one) which is formed inside each cell of the host metal lattice. It is considered, therefore, that each unit cell of the host lattice corresponds to minimum units of “solid fusion reactor”. In order to achieve “solid fusion”, just the generation of the ultrahigh density “deuterium-lump” (simply “pycnodeuterium-lump”) coagulated locally inside unit cell of the host lattice and/or the highly condensed metallic deuterium lattice should be an indispensable condition.

---

And Dufour's work, in which he speaks of "hydrex" and "deutex", "shrunken hydrogen atoms" like hydrinos, and clusters of the "hydrex" and "deutex", which sounds very much like Rydberg matter
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=dufour+hydrex

"The Hydrex Hypothesis - It has been shown by a quantum electrodynamics calculation 21 that resonances of longlifetime (seconds), nuclear dimensions (femtometres), and low energy of formation(electron volts) could exist. This concept seems to look like the “shrunken hydrogen atoms” proposed by various authors. 22,23 It is indeed very different in two ways: Being a metastable state, it needs energy to be formed (a few electron volts) and reverts to normal hydrogen after a few seconds, liberating back its energy of formation (it is thus not thesource of the energy observed). Its formation can be described as the electron spin-proton nuclear spin interaction becoming first order in the lattice environment (whereas, it is third order in a normal hydrogen atom). A concept similar to Ref. 21, but yielding a stable state has been developed. 24 The corresponding copious emission of X rays thatshould have been observed to explain the measured energies of reaction were notdetected. Note that in Ref. 19 a concept is given of a shrunken atom, solidly based on a plasma dielectric explanation. The high electron concentration, in the swimming electronlayer at metal interfaces, 19 invoked to increase the screening factor, could also favor the synthesis of hydrex. Moreover, we consider that the hydrex cannot yield a neutron because this reaction is strongly endothermic. To explain our results we put forward thefollowing working hypothesis: in a metal lattice and under proper conditions, the formation of such resonances (metastable state) could be favored. We propose to call them hydrex, and we assume that they are actually formed in CF and LENR experiments.

The Action of Hydrex on a Nucleus of the Lattice - Once formed, a number of hydrex could gather round a nucleus of the lattice to form a cluster of nuclear size and of very long lifetime compared to nuclear time (10 -22 s). They are likely be polarized by the electrostatic potential of the nucleus. The cluster can thus be described as a nucleus, surrounded at nuclear distance, first by a negative layer (the electrons of all the hydrex of the cluster) and then by a positive layer (the protons of these hydrex). The formation of the cluster would result in all hydrex involved transferring their kinetic energy to the nucleus, which would thus be in an excited state. In this excited cluster, nuclear rearrangements could take place, yielding mainly 4 He, nuclei of atomic masses smaller than that of the host metal, and small amounts of 3 He and tritium. Because this nuclear rearrangement is a many body reaction, the products formed should be stable products in their ground states, with most of the reaction energy being carried away as kinetic energy by the alpha particles formed. The inevitable excess of neutrons would react with the surrounding hydrex protons to yield mainly 4 He and small amounts of 3 He and 3 H. This last point is a general feature of hydrex catalyzed reactions. It explains why their energies of reaction are always higher than those of the corresponding fission reaction: The energy generated by the combination of the protons of the hydrex with the excess neutrons (resulting from the fission of the nucleus) to yield 4 He adds to the energy of fission. Figure 9 (Ref. 27) is a “common sense” illustration of this bound state, which looks very much like a nuclear-molecular state, 28 with the neutrons acting like the covalent bounding of electrons observed in chemical molecules."

---

Theoretical explanations for the new, dense state of deuterium Rydberg matter are already being put forward:

"Ultradense Deuterium"
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0912/0912.5414.pdf

"An attempt is made to explain the recently reported occurrence of ultradense deuterium as an isothermal transition of Rydberg matter into a high density phase by quantum mechanical exchange forces. It is conjectured that the transition is made possible by the formation of vortices in a Cooper pair electron fluid, separating the electrons from the deuterons, with the deuterons undergoing Bose-Einstein condensation in the core of the vortices. If such a state of deuterium should exist at the reported density of about 130,000 g/cm3, it would greatly facility the ignition of a thermonuclear detonation wave in pure deuterium, by placing the deuterium in a thin disc, to be ignited by a pulsed ultrafast laser or particle beam of modest energy... The existence of Rydberg matter was in 1980 first predicted by E.A. Manykin, Ozhovan and Puluektov [1]. But it was a research group in Sweden at University of Gothenburg, under the leadership of Leif Holmlid, which has recently announced it had discovered an ultradense form of deuterium by a phase transition from a Rydberg matter state of deuterium, a million times more dense than liquid deuterium [2]. Because this claim is so extraordinary, it must be taken with a great deal of skepticism. But since Leif Holmlid has an established record of publications about Rydberg matter in the refereed scientific literature the claim cannot be easily dismissed. It is the purpose of this communication to explore the question if such an unusual state of matter might exist."

---

The above paper also says "this points into the direction of a large effective mass for the electrons, possible if the electron fluid forms vortices, because vortices have a large effective mass." The concept of a large effective electron mass for dense deuterium has been a recurring theme...

http://www.springerlink.com/content/53q473g61w333164/
A possible mechanism for the occurrence of nuclear fusion at room temperature is presented. Neutralization of the positive charge of the deuteron nucleus by its orbiting electron due to large enhancement of effective mass results in the vanishing of the Coulomb barrier which facilitates fusion at room temperature.

http://www.askmar.com/Robert%20Bussard/Metal%20Lattice%20Fusion.pdf
A model of deuterium-deuterium fusion in metal lattices presented based on two phenomena:
a) reactions between virtual-state pairs of deuterons “bound” by electrons of high effective mass m* and
b) deuterium energy upscattering by fast ions from fusion or tritium reactions with virtual state nuclear structure groups in palladium nuclei.

---

The "Cold Fusion Battery" bears a lot of resemblance to metal hydride energy generation systems Randell Mills is working on at Blacklight Power (http://www.blacklightpower.com/new.shtml )...

Researcher Describes Conceptual Cold Fusion “Battery”, or Small Power Unit
http://www.greencarcongress.com/2010/03/miley-20100322.html#more

Some more on Miley's metal hydride based "Proton Reaction Cell" concept, sounds a lot like Mills' prototypes in a number of respects...
http://books.google.com/books?id=0-_QTYWBFvYC&pg=PA474&dq=proton+reaction+cell&cd=1

May explain anomalous spectral lines in interstellar gas, as claimed by hydrinos:
L. Holmlid, "Amplification by stimulated emission in Rydberg Matter clusters as the source of intense maser lines in interstellar space". Astrophys. Space Sci. 305 (2006) 91-98.

May be a type of dark matter, as claimed by hydrinos:
Badiei, Shahriar; Holmlid, Leif (2002). "Rydberg matter in space: low-density condensed dark matter". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 333: 360. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05399.x.

Has been found in the upper atmosphere of planets.
L. Holmlid, "The alkali metal atmospheres on the Moon and Mercury: explaining the stable exospheres by heavy Rydberg Matter clusters". Planetary Space Sci. 54 (2006) 101-112.

Could Rydberg matter also be present in the solar corona, helping to explain the anomalous elevated temperature and unusual spectral features that were once attributed to "coronium" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronium)? Again, as claimed by hydrinos?

There are many lines of evidence pointing to unusual electronic states of hydrogen over many decades, from the weird behavior of hydrogen-saturated palladium, nickel, titanium, etc, to the strange temperature distribution of hydrogen atoms in mixed gas plasmas, to difficult to explain interstellar and coronal spectral lines, etc. etc. which were "explained away" with unconvincing ad hoc classical mechanisms, many of which Mills picked up on and gathered in developing hydrino theory.

Excess energy production arising from a previously unknown mechanism in hydrogen containing systems is real and can be developed and commercialized; Mills has been observing it as "hydrino energy"; along with a lot of other people who have been observing it under various other names (cold fusion, etc). Sporadic reports of "excess heat", "dense hydrogen" or "dense deuterium" in an unusual electronic state, along with related unusual effects in highly loaded metal hydrides, plasmas, etc. go back as far as many decades, are real, but are not "hydrinos". They have to do with previously unanticipated / heretofore poorly understood phenomenon in atom clusters in condensed matter physics; dense clusters of hydrogen or deuterium atoms are capable of otherwise unattainable nuclear interactions (fusion or transmutation), and may also be a room temperature superconductor phase in metal lattices. It seems like Rydberg matter may be the explanation.

Blacklight Power may well be in an advantaged position to develop a real commercial energy production system, especially if Mills is willing to focus less on his theory and seriously go after commercial development. Nonetheless, it is a big engineering challenge to turn low-grade heat from costly materials into a competitive electrical power source.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Dougias
  • #38
Thanks for the extensive summary of papers Scarmani. Will be very helpful as I write up ultra-dense deuterium for "Project Icarus".
 
  • #39
Here are a couple more of the most recent papers, from relatively high impact reputable journals:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2009.06.046
Patrik U. Anderssona and Leif Holmlid (2009). "Ultra-dense deuterium: A possible nuclear fuel for inertial confinement fusion (ICF)". Physics Letters A 373 (34): 3067-70. doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2009.06.046

Abstract
The ejection of deuterons with kinetic energy release (KER) of 630 eV was proved recently by measuring the laser-induced ion time-of-flight (TOF-MS) with two different detectors at different distances [S. Badiei, P.U. Andersson, L. Holmlid, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 282 (2009) 70]. Realizing that the only possible energy release mechanism is Coulomb explosions, the D–D distance in the ultra-dense deuterium was determined to be constant at 2.3 pm. Using a long TOF-MS path now gives improved resolution. We show the strong effect of collisions in the ultra-dense material, and demonstrate that the kinetic energy of the ions increases with laser pulse power but that the number of ions formed is independent of the laser pulse power. This indicates special properties of the material. We also show that the two forms of condensed deuterium D(1) and D(−1) can be observed simultaneously as well resolved mass spectra of different forms. No intermediate bond lengths are observed. The two forms of deuterium are stable and well separated in bond length. We suggest that they switch rapidly back and forth as predicted by theory. A loosely built form with planar clusters of D(1) is observed here to be related to D(−1) formation.

Impact Factor: 2.174

---

http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3371718
Shahriar Badiei, Patrik U. Andersson, and Leif Holmlid (2010). "Production of ultradense deuterium: A compact future fusion fuel". Applied Physics Letters 96, 124103. doi:10.1063/1.3371718

Abstract
Ultradense deuterium as a nuclear fuel in laser-ignited inertial confinement fusion appears to have many advantages. The density of ultradense deuterium D(−1) is as high as 140 kg cm−3 or 1029 cm−3. This means that D(−1) will be very useful as a target fuel, circumventing the complex and unstable laser compression stage. We show that the material is stable apart from the oscillation between two forms, and can exist for days in the laboratory environment. We also demonstrate that an amount of D(−1) corresponding to tens of kilojoules is produced in each experiment. This may be sufficient for break-even.

Impact Factor: 3.726

---

The later article also references earlier papers from Miley:

"The formation of dense deuterium and hydrogen aggregates inside metals like palladium has been reported by Miley and co-workers. Their results are in good agreement with ours, for example the fact that Coulomb Debye screening means that deuterons can approach with low kinetic energy to a distance of 2–4 pm thus behaving like neutral particles. This is an important factor in the observed low energy nuclear reactions LENR. The distance cited is similar to the bond distance found for ultradense deuterium D1 of 2.3 pm. The superconducting quantum interference device SQUID magnetic measurements provided evidence for superconducting filaments of hydrogen inside Pd with a density up to 10^24 cm−3, possibly in the form of clusters in dislocations."

A. Lipson, B. J. Heuser, C. Castano, G. Miley, B. Lyakhov, and A. Mitin,
Phys. Rev. B 72, 212507 2005.

H. Hora and G. H. Miley, J. Fusion Energy 26, 349 2007.

X. Yang, G. H. Miley, and H. Hora, AIP Conf. Proc. 1103, 450 2009.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #40
Very good. A new paper I haven't seen. The potential of UDD for fusion rockets is amazing. The high density should trap neutrons to add their energy to the exhaust and some fraction of the 3He & T produced should fuse to 4He too. Excellent for rocket exhausts. I'm hopeful of exhaust velocity as high as 18,000 - 24,000 km/s.
 
  • #41
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2010.04.055
F. Winterberg (2010). "Ultra-dense deuterium and cold fusion claims". Physics Letters A 374 (27): 2766-71. doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2010.04.055

Abstract
An attempt is made to explain the recently reported occurrence of 14 MeV neutron induced nuclear reactions in deuterium metal hydrides as the manifestation of a slightly radioactive ultra-dense form of deuterium, with a density of 130,000 g/cm3 observed by a Swedish research group through the collapse of deuterium Rydberg matter. In accordance with this observation it is proposed that a large number of deuterons form a “linear-atom” supermolecule. By the Madelung transformation of the Schrödinger equation, the linear deuterium supermolecule can be described by a quantized line vortex. A vortex lattice made up of many such supermolecules is possible only with deuterium, because deuterons are bosons, and the same is true for the electrons, which by the electron–phonon interaction in a vortex lattice form Cooper pairs. It is conjectured that the latent heat released by the collapse into the ultra-dense state has been misinterpreted as cold fusion. Hot fusion though, is here possible through the fast ignition of a thermonuclear detonation wave from a hot spot made with a 1 kJ 10 petawatt laser in a thin slice of the ultra-dense deuterium.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedwardt_Winterberg

---

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2010.03.009
Patrik U. Andersson and Leif Holmlid (2010). "Deuteron energy of 15 MK in ultra-dense deuterium without plasma formation: Temperature of the interior of the Sun". Physics Letters A 374 (28): 2856-60. doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2010.03.009

Abstract
Deuterons are released with kinetic energy up to 630 eV from ultra-dense deuterium as shown previously, by Coulomb explosions initiated by ns laser pulses at <10^11 W cm^-2. With higher laser intensity at 10^14 W cm^-2, the initial kinetic energy now observed by TOF-MS with variable acceleration energy is up to 1100 eV per deuteron. This indicates ejection of one deuteron by Coulomb repulsion from two stationary charges in the material. It proves a full kinetic energy release of 1260 eV or a deuteron temperature of 15 MK, similar to the temperature in the interior of the Sun. Plasma processes are excluded by the sharp TOF peaks observed and by the slow signal variation with laser intensity. Deuterons with even higher energy from multiple charge repulsion are probably detected. D + D fusion processes are expected to exist in the ultra-dense phase without plasma formation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #42
Hi scarmani

Interesting papers. The Winterberg paper is especially interesting as it tries to explain "cold fusion" in terms of UDD formation, which should involve significant energy release of its own. He also discusses fast ignition of a small UDD target to use as a trigger for larger amounts of fusion fuel.

3He can form bosonic Cooper pairs and could potentially be induced to collapse into an ultradense state just like deuterium. As D+3He fusion is largely aneutronic this is a very attractive possibility, making a fusion rocket engine a much more practical prospect for interstellar applications. Mining Uranus for 3He is probably the most efficient means of sourcing the stuff, as it is very rare on Earth and not much more abundant in lunar regolith. Recent studies of Uranus have indicated a somewhat faster rotation rate than the 17.24 hours inferred from its magnetosphere. A day of 16.58 hours means a boost of ~2.7 km/s for a nuclear ramjet launching from its equator. Because of the predominantly H/He atmosphere the top speed of a ramjet is ~10 km/s, meaning only a tiny rocket boost is required for final orbital speed.

But is it needed? Winterberg has suggested that a thermonuclear ignition/detonation wave can confine the neutrons produced by pure D+D fusion sufficiently to thermalise them, transferring their fusion energy to the total reaction products. He estimates exhaust velocities of 19,000 km/s are ultimately possible.
 
Last edited:
  • #43
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0263034610000236
Shahriar Badiei, Patrik U. Andersson, and Leif Holmlid (2010). "Laser-driven nuclear fusion D+D in ultra-dense deuterium: MeV particles formed without ignition". Laser and Particle Beams 28 (02): 313-7. doi:10.1017/S0263034610000236

Abstract
The short D-D distance of 2.3 pm in the condensed material ultra-dense deuterium means that it is possible that only a small disturbance is required to give D+D fusion. This disturbance could be an intense laser pulse. The high excess kinetic energy of several hundred eV given to the deuterons by laser induced Coulomb explosions in the material increases the probability of spontaneous fusion without the need for a high plasma temperature. The temperature calculated from the normal kinetic energy of the deuterons of 630 eV from the Coulomb explosions is 7 MK, maybe a factor of 10 lower than required for ignition. We now report on experiments where several types of high-energy particles from laser impact on ultra-dense deuterium are detected by plastic scintillators. Fast particles with energy up to 2 MeV are detected at a time-of-flight as short as 60 ns, while neutrons are detected at 50 ns time-of-flight after passage through a steel plate. A strong signal peaking at 22.6 keV u−1 is interpreted as due to mainly T retarded by collisions with H atoms in the surrounding cloud of dense atomic hydrogen.

---

"1. INTRODUCTION

...

To investigate the possibility of fusion with a relatively weak laser beam, we have studied the fast particles released from laser impact on ultra-dense deuterium D(-1). The experiments employ time-of-flight (TOF) particle detection with a detector (plastic scintillator), which is only sensitive to the highest kinetic energies of the ejected particles. The energy range for the particles emitted from D(-1) is 6 keV (−3 MeV), with the lower limit given by the scintillator detector. Production of such energetic particles indicates nuclear fusion of the closely located deuterons in the ultra-dense material.

...

2. EXPERIMENTAL

A Nd:YAG (neodymium doped yttrium aluminum garnet) pumped dye laser with a power of <100 mJ per 5 ns long pulse at 10 Hz is used at 564 nm. The laser beam is focused at the center of the ultra-high vacuum chamber by an f = 400 mm lens, giving an intensity of <5 × 1011 W cm−2 at the approximately 100 µm beam waist located in the center of the chamber. Close to the center of the apparatus (Fig. 1), a K doped iron oxide catalyst sample (Meima & Menon, 2001; Holmlid, 2002; Muhler et al., 1992) is used as the emitter to produce D(-1) from deuterium gas at a pressure up to 1 × 10−5 mbar.

...

Further studies (unpublished) of the 50 ns peak show a quadratic signal variation with laser intensity, which is unlikely for photon production but expected for neutrons produced in pair-wise high-energy deuteron collisions.

...

4. CONCLUSIONS

Using a plastic scintillator as detector, fast particles are observed by TOF over a 1.12 m flight distance from the interaction of a pulsed laser beam with ultra-dense deuterium. This interaction is known to give fast deuterons with energy as high as 1.2 keV. Fast particles with energy < 1.8 MeV u−1 are proposed to be protons from D+D fusion, with an initial energy of 3 MeV. Fast particles observed at 50 ns TOF thus with energy 2 MeV after passage through a steel edge are concluded to be neutrons, since protons cannot pass through the steel and X-rays have much shorter TOF. The intense signal peak at 22.6 keV u−1 is proposed to be T and 3He from D+D fusion arriving with such relatively low energy after two collisions with H in the dense cloud of H(1) outside the emitter. Thus, all particles expected from D+D fusion are observed."
 
  • #44
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/244/3/032036
George H Miley, Xiaoling Yang, Hora Heinrich, Kirk Flippo, Sandrine Gaillard, Dustin Offermann and D Cort Gautier (2010). "Advances in proposed D-Cluster inertial confiment fusion target". Journal of Physics: Conference Series 244 032036. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/244/3/032036

http://iopscience.iop.org/1742-6596/244/3/032036/pdf/1742-6596_244_3_032036.pdf

Abstract
Our recent research has developed a technique for imbedding ultra high density deuterium "clusters" (D cluster) in Palladium (Pd) thin film. Experiments have shown that in Pd these condensed matter state clusters approach metallic conditions, exhibiting super conducting properties. This deuterium cluster is achieved through electrochemically loading-unloading deuterium into a thin metal film, such as Palladium (Pd). During the loading process, Palladium lattice expands significantly due to invasion of deuterium into the interstitial sites. With the large enough stress, some linear lattice imperfections, called dislocations, form at / transformation interface. These dislocation defects form a strong potential trap causing deuterium to condense. In the present study, a new method employing nano-structuring of the Pd is proposed to significantly improve the site density over the target volume, suggesting that a sizable region of the compressed target deuterium can reach densities an order of magnitude higher than possible with prior target designs. This improved cluster packing fraction will enable a significant increase of the fusion reaction burn density, hence the target burn-up efficiency.
 
  • #45
Fascinating! I have read the article but not even close to all the comments here. Will do that soon.
Anyway, what also interests me is extreme weight-to-size ratio.
Might have some potential applications in certain mechanical systems(micro flywheels, etc...)
 
  • #46
Hello Scarmani and others interested in Rydberg matter,

Using some precursor material provided by Holmlid and also some other material synthesized by a chemist colleague, we have been making potassium Rydberg matter for the last six months (since January 2011). We have confirmed some of Holmlid's RF emission results but have different interpretations of others. In particular, I would be interested
if anyone reading this thread has a theory of how this material could transform Coulomb
explosions into large-amplitude magnetic field changes, which we have measured many times.
 
  • #47
Hi kdstephen
I was wondering if anyone else was working with RM. Has your lab experimented with UDD at all?
 
Last edited:
  • #48
No, we are only working with potassium. Even potassium-based RM
has a high energy content of ~4 ev/atom. We are looking at faster
ways of synthesizing it so as to have enough to study. What is your interest
in RM?
 
  • #49
kdstephan said:
No, we are only working with potassium. Even potassium-based RM
has a high energy content of ~4 ev/atom. We are looking at faster
ways of synthesizing it so as to have enough to study. What is your interest
in RM?
The possibility of it making fusion of deuterium much easier than the solid or liquid state.
 
  • #50
Mr

kdstephan said:
Hello Scarmani and others interested in Rydberg matter,

Using some precursor material provided by Holmlid and also some other material synthesized by a chemist colleague, we have been making potassium Rydberg matter for the last six months (since January 2011). We have confirmed some of Holmlid's RF emission results but have different interpretations of others. In particular, I would be interested
if anyone reading this thread has a theory of how this material could transform Coulomb
explosions into large-amplitude magnetic field changes, which we have measured many times.

You should go to Mills Yahoo group and see if he can give a plausible theory to explain your observations. Generally he will answer technical questions, the site group's address is:

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SocietyforClassicalPhysics
 
Back
Top