Uncertainty: Measuring Electron Position w/o Light

  • Thread starter Thread starter cosmic.ash
  • Start date Start date
cosmic.ash
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Could the uncertainity principle be refuted if we do not measure the position of an electron by sending light at it but instead measure its grav influence on another subatomic particle
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cosmic.ash said:
Could the uncertainity principle be refuted if we do not measure the position of an electron by sending light at it but instead measure its grav influence on another subatomic particle
The HUP should not be confused with observer effect. The HUP deals with the simultaneous measurement of two quantities, not observation. In other words, the HUP doesn't care about how we measure the two quantities just the fact that we have measured them.
 
Last edited:
Hootenanny said:
The HUP should not be confused with observer effect. The HUP deals with the simultaneous measurement of two quantities, not observation. In other words, the HUP doesn't care about how we measure the two quantities just the fact that we have measured them.
Not exactly; see this thread (in particular, post n.16):
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=179089&highlight=uncertainty&page=2
 
lightarrow said:
Not exactly; see this thread (in particular, post n.16):
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=179089&highlight=uncertainty&page=2
Good catch and fair point lightarrow. I'll rephrase;

The HUP should not be confused with observer effect. The HUP deals with the measurement of two quantities, not observation. In other words, the HUP doesn't care about how we measure the two quantities just the fact that we have measured them.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top