Unambiguous Quantum Gravity Phenomenology: Bonder & Sudarsky

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
555
arXiv:0811.1229 (cross-list from gr-qc) [ps, pdf, other]
Title: Unambiguous Quantum Gravity Phenomenology Respecting Lorentz Symmetry
Authors: Yuri Bonder, Daniel Sudarsky
Comments: Based on a talk given at the 40th SMP: Geometry and Quanta
Subjects: General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc); High Energy Physics - Phenomenology (hep-ph)
We describe a refined version of a previous proposal for the exploration of quantum gravity phenomenology. Unlike the original scheme, the one presented here is free from sign ambiguities while it shares with the previous one the essential features. It focuses on effects that could be thought as arising from a fundamental granularity of quantum space-time. The sort of schemes we consider are in sharp contrast with the simplest scenarios in that such granularity is assumed to respect Lorentz Invariance but it remains otherwise unspecified. The proposal is fully observer covariant, it involves non-trivial couplings of curvature to matter fields and leads to a well defined phenomenology. We present the effective Hamiltonian which could be used to analyze concrete experimental situations, and we shortly review the degree to which this proposal is in line with the fundamental ideas behind the equivalence principle.

Way over my head, but i thought it might be interesting.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Granular space is an appealing idea, but lacks observational support. It should fuzzy up [diffract] the images of exceedingly distant objects.
 
does that assume that the 'granules' form a regular crystal-like pattern? what if its more like an amorphous substance?
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
Back
Top