Unbalanced Tensions in Cable Geometry: A Scientific Inquiry

  • Thread starter Thread starter stinlin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cable
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the unexpected disparity in the x components of tension in a cable system with an eye bolt. Despite initial assumptions that the tensions should be equal due to static equilibrium, calculations reveal one set of x components is significantly larger than the other. The participants explore potential reasons for this discrepancy, including the influence of the eye bolt as a moment connection and the angles of the cables. It is suggested that the angles on either side of the weight must be equal to maintain equilibrium, but differing measurements raise questions about the accuracy of the data. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding tension as a vector and the role of the eye bolt in balancing the system.
stinlin
Messages
72
Reaction score
1
http://img185.imageshack.us/img185/8830/cablesyv1.gif

You're looking at the design for my recent lab we did. Now, you would think, given the geometry of the loadings (i.e. post heights, eye bolt height, weight heights, distances from a specified origin) that the x components of the tension in the middle cables (on the left and right side of the eye bolt) would be equal, no?

BUT! After using my data and calculating the x components of these tensions, I'm getting that one set is about twice the other set of x values. Is there a physical reason for this, or is there some unknown error? I've checked and rechecked my calculations, but NOTHING is making sense.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
No, they can't be equal. Why? sum forces in any direction and do some thinking.

Post thoughts, and I will help you.
 
Well I thought that they had to be equal because if you were to analyze the forces on the eye bolt, oh...But that could be considered a moment connection for this case (i.e. a connection that can resist forces in x,y,z and moments in x,y,z) so that maybe this connection adds to the forces in the x direction, thus making the tension values not equal?

Problem is, I'm still not seeing why the x components wouldn't cancel each other out. If the report on this data wasn't due tomorrow afternoon, I'd go through and try sectioning off portions of the cable and calculation tensions there.

Can you shed some more light on this by chance?
 
Problem is, I'm still not seeing why the x components wouldn't cancel each other out.

Why should they?
 
Well if you consider the eye bolt as the object of analysis, would you not have something like the following picture?

http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/8306/cables2jn4.gif

Although that almost wouldn't make sense since there's no y-component...

Or is it more like this?
http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/7025/cables3dl1.gif

In the first test we performed, there was no eye bolt, so the cable went directly to the other weight. I may be making the wrong assumption that the tensions must equal out. I'm kind of analyzing this as a system like the hanging chandelier example we're all so familiar with (the fixture hangs from n cables, find the tensions in each, and all the x-components there equal zero).

Also, the system is in static equilibrium, so I figured that analysis at any point on the cable system should come out to being in static equilibrium.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What class is this for?
 
Structural Mechanics I, taken after Statics and during Dynamics.
 
What is the first thing they teach you in statics?
 
Sum of the forces = 0, sum of the moments = 0.
 
  • #10
Hmmm, can you show me how you got the tension values?

Actually, all I care about is what are the angles you got on each segment.
 
  • #11
Alright - for the left side going to the bolt, I found the angle to be 65.59* in run 1 and 48.74* in run 2. For the right cable, I found the angle leading to the bolt to be 41.67* and 17.281* for runs 1 and 2 respectively.

If it helps, the weights in run 1 were 10 lbs and 8 lbs and in run 2, 3 lbs and 5 lbs.
 
  • #12
Aha, the tension is equal!

Sorry for leading you the wrong way! -actually it makes sense now.
 
  • #13
Can you explain why I'd be getting x-component values that differ so much then?
 
  • #14
Because the x-component values are *not* the same. It is a component of what?
 
  • #15
It's a component of the overall tension.
 
  • #16
So does that mean the components are equal?
 
  • #17
Well I assume they should be equal in order to maintain equilibrium...
 
  • #18
When you have a single continuous cable, the tension is the same all throughout the cable. The reason I asked you for the angle is because the component of tension in the y direction must balance each mass.

For the 10lb mass at an angle of 65.59 this means: 10=2T*sin(65.59)

Solving for T gives the value at T=5.49lbs.

Now, do a force balance at the 8lbs mass. 8=2*5.49*sin(theta)

Solving for theta yields: 46.76 degrees, which is very close to what you got:
41.67.

Remember, tension is a vector.
 
  • #19
I should note that the angles on each side of the weight are not equal. And yes, I know tension is a vector. :-P
 
  • #20
Well I assume they should be equal in order to maintain equilibrium...

This is the error in your thinking. You should have looked more carefully at that eyehook. When you added the 10lb weight, you would have noticed that the rope around the eyehook would have slowly swung in the direction of the 10lb mass. In other words, it would not be directly in line with the middle of the eye hook anymore. This would allow the eye hook to provide a reaction force in the x-direction to compensate for the imbalance in the x-direction due to only the ropes themselves (which as you said, don't balance). It is the hook that completes the balance of the system.
 
  • #21
stinlin said:
I should note that the angles on each side of the weight are not equal. And yes, I know tension is a vector. :-P

Oh...what were all the angles then?
 
  • #22
No, this is wrong. The angles on each side of the weight have to be equal. Sorry, its the law of statics. Do a force balance on any weight and section off the rope. If they are not equal, the mass will move in the direction of the imbalance.

Your measurements are probably wrong.
 
  • #23
I see you're argument, but we also had a situation like this:

http://img239.imageshack.us/img239/7162/cablesxwr3.gif

Those aren't the exact weights, but that's essentially what the cable loading looked like. The angles are DEFINITELY different in this case. I should remind you that this is one cable that goes from the left side, through the eye bolt, to the right side. The middle bolt is the highest point, followed by the right bolt, and then the left.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #24
What were the angles on the 10lb weight in that case?
 
  • #25
It's only a 5 lb weight, and the angles are 17.281 and 31.492 (left angle, right angle)
 
  • #26
And I don't want to sound conceited, but our first test that we ran had an error percent of about 2%, so my thoughts are that we definitely made the right measurements and calculations. I could be TOTALLY off though...
 
  • #27
Oh yes, and my group member just told me he got values that were about 2 times in size also.
 
  • #28
Can you draw it out with all the angles labeled. I don't know where they go.
 

Similar threads

Tension in landing cable on an aircraft carrier
Replies
4
Views
4K
Free Fall and Tension in a cable
Replies
1
Views
2K
Find cable tension in three dimensions
Replies
11
Views
13K
How Can You Calculate Minimum Cable Tension in a Catenary Equation Using Excel?
Replies
11
Views
28K
Which Cable Has Greater Tension in a Spinning Chair Problem?
Replies
1
Views
2K
Tension, shear and torque acting on a bolt and cantilever.
Replies
2
Views
13K
Solve Torque Confusion: Find D to Snap Cable in Fig. 12-35
Replies
3
Views
7K
Solve for Tension in Equilibrium: Frictionless Rod with 50lb Load at x=4.5
Replies
3
Views
2K
Finding the Magnitude of a Vertical Force in a Simple 3D Statics Problem
Replies
2
Views
6K
Simple Machines Revisited + more - making 2.5 ton lift
Replies
2
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top