Hey all,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

In Schaum's outline it claims that the sample variance of s^2 is a biased estimate of the population variance because its mean is given by:

[tex] \mu_{s^{2}} = \frac{N-1}{N}\sigma^{2} [/tex]

which I am cool with. It then says that the modified variance given by:

[tex] \hat{s} = \frac{N}{N-1}s^{2} [/tex]

is an unbiased estimator. I know this should be really easy, but I don't know how to show it.

Also even if I accept that [tex] \hat{s}^{2} [/tex] is an unbiased estimator of the variance, Schaum's outline claims that [tex] \hat{s}[/tex] is a biased estimator of the population standard deviation. I don't see how this could be possible. if the variance is unbiased, and we take the square root of that unbiased estimator, won't the result also be unbiased ?

Thanks,

Thrillhouse

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Unbiased estimator of variance

Loading...

Similar Threads - Unbiased estimator variance | Date |
---|---|

Unbiased estimator for The exponential | Dec 23, 2011 |

What is an unbiased estimator ? | Nov 5, 2011 |

Asymptotically unbiased & consistent estimators | Jul 8, 2011 |

Unbiased estimator | Jan 15, 2011 |

Biased and unbiased estimators | Apr 20, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**