Uncertainties and significant figures

Paragon
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
A quick question about uncertainties and significant figures:

Say, we have some numbers with a particular uncertainty 0.1 of each of them. What happens if the sum of these numbers has a greater amount of significant figures than each of the numbers alone? For instance,

1.01 + 9.99 = 11.0 or 11.00? (I believe it is the former)

Then, suppose I keep the uncertainty of the sum 11.0, +/-(2 x 0.1), as percentage, say x per cent, and make some calculations. The sum 11.0 will then be changed.

Would I have to take x per cent of the result? For instance,

11.0 x 2 = 22.0 +/- x%?

Or should I not convert the uncertainty to percentage? If not, that if the units are different?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If your measurements have an uncertainty of 0.1 then you should write them as 1.01 or 9.99 since those imply they are correct to +/- 0.005, not +/- 0.1.

Assuming that you really mean 0.005, then the lowest possible value of the first is 1.01- 0.005= 1.005 and the largest possible value is 1.015. Similarly, the lowest possible value of the second is 9.99- 0.005= 9.985 and its highest value is 9.995.
That means that the lowest possible value of their sum is 1.005+ 9.985= 10.990 and the highest value is 1.015+ 9.995= 11.010. The midpoint of those is 11.000 and they are 11.000+/- 0.005 again so that should be written as 11.00 to indicate that the uncetainty is the last digit.

There is an engineer's "rule of thumb" that if two measurements are added or subtracted, their "errors" are added (NOT subtracted!) and if two measurements are multiplied or divided, their percentage "errors" are added.
 
I was taught that when adding or subracting you round to the least precice decimal place. so 9.99 +1.01 would be 11.00 but when multiplying or dividing you round to the least number of significant digits, so 1.4*456.2 = 640 because 1.4 only has 2 sig digs.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
20K
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Featured
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top