I Uncertainty of coefficients after a least square fit

sth
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Fitting data to a linear function (y=a0+a1*x) with least square gives the coefficients a0 and a1. I am having trouble with calculating the uncertainty of a0. I understand that the diagonal elements of the covariance matrix C is the square of the uncertainty of each coefficient if there are no off-diagonal elements. But what is the uncertainty of a0 if there are off-diagonal elements?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello sth, :welcome:

Found your answers and a good reference in this thread

[edit] on second thought: the errors are the diagonal elements. The off-diagonal elements come in when you evaluate expressions where both coefficients appear and you want the uncertainty in the result.
 
Hi BvU,
Thank you for welcoming and the reference. Seems like Eq 22 of Kirchner's note is what I was looking for.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Back
Top