Uncertainty of position in an infinite potential well

Ananthan9470
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
The ground state energy of a particle trapped in an infinite potential well of width a is given by (ħ2π2)/2ma2. So the momentum is given by (2mE)1/2 = ħπ/a. Since this is a precise value, doesn't that mean that we know momentum with 100% certainty? And if that is the case shouldn't the uncertainty in position be infinite?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your relation for the momentum is incorrect.
You can find the momentum in QM by applying the momentum operator - just like you find the energy by applying the energy operator. So what happes when you apply the momentum operator to the ground-state energy eigenfunction for a particle in a box?

Note: The momentum wavefunction is the Fourier transform of the position wavefunction.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Ananthan9470
Ananthan9470 said:
The ground state energy of a particle trapped in an infinite potential well of width a is given by (ħ2π2)/2ma2. So the momentum is given by (2mE)1/2 = ħπ/a. Since this is a precise value, doesn't that mean that we know momentum with 100% certainty? And if that is the case shouldn't the uncertainty in position be infinite?

But if all you know is E, then the momentum is \pm \sqrt{2mE}. So the expectation value of p is 0 (it's just as likely to be pointing in one direction as another). A rough estimate of the uncertainty in a quantity is the standard deviation, which would tell us:

\delta p = \sqrt{\langle p^2\rangle - \langle p \rangle^2} where \langle X \rangle means the expectation value, or average value. So for this problem:

\langle p \rangle = 0
\langle p^2 \rangle = 2mE

So
\delta p = \sqrt{2mE} = \frac{\hbar \pi}{a}

So the uncertainty of p is not zero.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Ananthan9470 and Simon Bridge
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top