Uncertainty -- particle through single slit

AI Thread Summary
Particles passing through a single slit of width 0.17 mm exhibit diffraction, with a de Broglie wavelength of 561 nm. The Heisenberg uncertainty principle is applied to determine the minimum angular spread, which involves calculating Δpy and using the relationship between momentum and wavelength. The calculations yield an angular spread of approximately 2.6 x 10^-4 rad for one side, or 5.2 x 10^-4 rad for the total range. However, the homework software rejects these answers, suggesting a potential misunderstanding of the problem or a calculation error. It is noted that the angular spread can also be derived from the ratio of wavelength to slit width, reinforcing the connection between uncertainty and diffraction.
limper
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Some particles pass through a single slit of width W = 0.17 mm. After the particles pass through the slit they spread out over a range of angles. The de Broglie wavelength of each particle is λ = 561 nm. Use the Heisenberg uncertainty principle to determine the minimum range of angles.

θ = (the diagram shows theta as the entire area between the first two minima, not just from the center to one side)

Homework Equations


It seems like this would just be normal diffraction with sin()=λ/d.

The problem asks for it to be done via the uncertainty principle so:
ΔyΔpy>=h/4π
Δpy=psin()
p=h/λ

The Attempt at a Solution


sin()=λ/d yields (561*10^-9)/(.17*10^-3)=.0033 rad, or .0066 rad for the entire range.

The other method gives the same result if you use just h, without the 1/4π, for the uncertainty equation. Is there a reason for that? I know h/4π is the lower bound, is there something inherent to the problem that limits it to h?

otherwise:
ΔyΔpy>=h/4π
Δpy>=h/(4πΔy)
Δpy>=3.1*10^-31

p=h/λ
p=(6.626*10^-34)/(561*10^-9)
p=1.2*10^-27

sin()=Δpy/p
sin()=(3.1*10^-31)/(1.2*10^-27)
=2.6*10^-4 rad or 5.2*10^-4 rad for the entire range

This seems to make sense to me, but the homework software is rejecting both answers. I've tried it with answers past the significant digits and no dice, so I'm wondering if I've misunderstood something or made a silly mistake somewhere.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
limper said:
sin()=λ/d yields (561*10^-9)/(.17*10^-3)=.0033 rad, or .0066 rad for the entire range.

The other method gives the same result if you use just h, without the 1/4π,

i do not know /can not guess about the software you are using but the angular spread comes out to be wavelength /slit width using uncertainty relation.
i think the uncertainty be taken of the order of h rather than minimum of the product h/4pi. as the wave packet is not being defined for exact measurement of the product.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top