Uncertainty Principle & Nucleons - Sam

Rabadi
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Lately, I have been thinking about the uncertainty principle (UP) and how it applies to the nucleons. Now, I understand that the reason that the electrons do not collapse into the nucleus may be explained by the UP. If the electrons collapse into the nucleus, the uncertainty in position would be so small that the momentum of the electrons would be so great that the electrons would simply fly off. So here comes my question, if the protons (or neutrons) are localized in the nucleus, then they're momentum must also be large. However, that's not the case since they're bound by the strong force. Is this a violation of the UP? Or am I missing some concept?

I would appreciate any response. Thank you.

Sam
 
Physics news on Phys.org
UP presents a relationship between uncertainty in position and uncertainty in momentum. Since the nucleons have far more mass, they can be "localized" easier than an electron with the same velocity uncertainty.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
5K
Back
Top