Uncertainty principle with/out detectors

hollowsolid
Messages
14
Reaction score
1
I think I undetstand the role of the uncertainty principle in explaining the existence of interference patterns in the double slit expt with electrons i.e. the slits reduce the uncertainty in position and consuequently there is a greater uncertainty in momentum which results in interference patterns.

However when path information thru the slits is provided by detectors, why isn't this an equally effective means of constraining the position uncertainty and thereby increasing the momentum uncertainty leading to interference patterns?

Most explanations seem to use the UP in the absence of detection and wave function collapse in the case of detection.

Why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Similar topic was opened by me.
Double slit experiment is one special case of Feynman explanation of QED (QED: the strange theory of light and matter.) Feynman clearly explain the basis of QED here. But I have not found explanation for uncertainty principle. Maybe your explanation is a way to it?! And, maybe the Feynman book is also answer to your question?!
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top