Unclear formulation of Ward identity

IRobot
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am really familiar with the Ward-Takashi identity formulated in the form k_{\mu}M^{\mu\nu}=0 applying the fact that the longitudinal polarization of the 4 vector A is nonphysical (redundant) and should not contribute to the physical amplitudes. But, by opening a test subject on QED, I ran into this formula: -\frac{1}{\alpha}\Box\partial_{\mu}A^{\mu} + \partial^{\mu}\frac{\delta\Gamma}{\delta A^{\mu}} + ie\psi\frac{\delta\Gamma}{\delta\psi} -ie\bar{\psi}\frac{\delta\Gamma}{\delta\bar{\psi}}=0 which is quite unclear for me. \Gamma [\psi,\bar{\psi},A] is the generator of 1PI graphs. Does someone have a reference on the derivation of that, or could show me how to get this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Section 12.1, eq. 12.13 in Kaku "Quantum Field Theory - A modern introduction" (1993)
 
Thanks, I checked in Kaku's book, and indeed it's not hard to derive, by playing with Z[\eta,\bar{\eta},J^{\mu}] and \Gamma[\psi,\bar{\psi},A^{\mu}].
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top