Uncovering the Mechanics of the Universe - Is it My Intellectual Property?

  • Thread starter Thread starter connect
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the implications of revealing the mechanics of the universe and the ownership of theories in scientific discourse. A participant claims to have a mathematically sound model of the universe and questions if it qualifies as intellectual property. It is noted that scientists typically do not assert property rights over their theories, as publishing in journals protects against theft of ideas. The conversation references historical figures like Newton and Leibniz to illustrate how ego and recognition can influence scientific credit. Ultimately, the consensus suggests that no one truly "owns" the theory of everything, as scientific knowledge is meant to be shared and built upon.
connect
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
Has anybody thought of the implications of what will happen when the mechanics of the universe is revealed?

I would like to discuss the matter because I have an absolutley bullet proof model of the universe. It is mathemathically sound and accounts for all percievable phenoma felt.

Is it my intellectual property?

:)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Scientists don't usually insist on property rights in their theories. They publish in journals where anyone can see. The publication however guarantees that it won't be stolen. If anyone were to say "See this is my theory and her's how it goes" (stolen from you), then critics would pipe and say "That's connect's theory that was published in the Journal of Bright Ideas a while ago!"
 
How would an unacreditted "crackpot" theorist get published... if in fact he or she is the one that comes up with the TOE?

Hey... it could happen :-)
 
They could self-publish. Then 25 years from now, after a huge paradigm shift, when mainstream science has finally come around and their conclusions are come to independently by researchers who can get published in a peer-reviewed journal, they will be able to point to the copyright date and say "look, I said this 25 years ago. Idiots."
 
hahahaha

Anyone remember Newton and Lebinez and calculus
 
Er, Leibniz. Newton and Leibniz had this ego thing going. Leibniz didn't stand a chance. Sir Isaac was so far up the food chain he was untouchable. You can brush away dust, but, not the ego's. Nobody 'owns' the TOE [assuming it can be found]. If I am mistaken, I need to run to the patent office and register my claim to 1 + 1 = 2.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top