Uncovering the Mystery: Decoding a Unique Integer Sequence

  • Thread starter Thread starter beamthegreat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Patterns
AI Thread Summary
A user claims to have created a unique integer sequence and seeks assistance in solving it. They provide the first 89 integers of the sequence and a graph, but the clarity of the graph is questioned due to mislabeling and the absence of certain values. Participants express skepticism about the uniqueness of the sequence, suggesting that without a generator function or more context, it may not be worth the effort to analyze. The discussion references the On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences (OEIS) as a resource for identifying patterns in integer sequences. Some users attempt to create their own sequences, indicating a broader interest in generating unique integer patterns. Overall, the conversation highlights the challenges of verifying the uniqueness of mathematical sequences without sufficient information.
beamthegreat
Messages
116
Reaction score
7
I believe I have created an integer sequence that is truly unique. I would appreciate it if someone could try to solve this.

Here is the first 89 integers of this sequence: 1,0,1,1,1,1,1,2,2,3,0,1,0,3,0,3,0,5,2,3,1,0,1,3,1,3,1,6,4,9,4,5,4,9,4,9,4,13,8,5,1,0,1,5,1,5,1,10,6,13,6,7,6,13,6,13,6,19,12,7,1,0,1,7,1,7,1,14,8,25,16,17,16,25,16,25,16,33,24,18,10,9,10,18,10,18,10,27,19 Here is a graph of this sequence:
Screen Shot 2022-05-11 at 04.53.01.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What makes an integer sequence unique?
 
beamthegreat said:
I believe I have created an integer sequence that is truly unique. I would appreciate it if someone could try to solve this.

Here is the first 89 integers of this sequence: 1,0,1,1,1,1,1,2,2,3,0,1,0,3,0,3,0,5,2,3,1,0,1,3,1,3,1,6,4,9,4,5,4,9,4,9,4,13,8,5,1,0,1,5,1,5,1,10,6,13,6,7,6,13,6,13,6,19,12,7,1,0,1,7,1,7,1,14,8,25,16,17,16,25,16,25,16,33,24,18,10,9,10,18,10,18,10,27,19
What is the prize?

I can create a random sequence as well, so what's the point? Are you saying that you used some generator function that if we're smart enough we should be able to figure it out? Can you at least bound the problem? How many terms did you use in your generator function? If you used 20 terms, it will be a waste of my time, no?
 
  • Like
Likes DaveE and Vanadium 50
So, you are not interested in finding out if your pattern is unique to your particular creation algorithm, right? If the pattern is NOT unique, you don't care, you just want to see if we can identify the pattern.
 
Using the first 10
https://oeis.org/search?q=1,0,1,1,1,1,1,2,2,3&sort=&language=english&go=SearchHmmm..
let me come up with another integer sequence that is truly unique
7 15 22 36 64 13 6 40 41 45 52 9 5 7 61 63 69 18 18 30 35 52 56 5 4 5 6 28 67 10 37 39 55 63 69 23 18 27 33 39 44 8
...this one is finite... but could become countably infinite...
building the sequence by prepending, rather than appending.
Generating this integer sequence might also be of value.

Here's a search on a subset https://www.google.com/search?q=6+40+41+45+52+9
 
DaveE said:
Um, what's the point here? It doesn't match the 11th term. Am I missing something?
The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences (or OEIS) a place where one can search for such sequences.
It might even provide a clue to how such sequences arise
... especially since the OP didn't provide much of a clue.

If the OP's sequence is "of general interest", it can be contributed.
 
beamthegreat said:
Here is the first 89 integers of this sequence: 1,0,1,1,1,1,1,2,2,3,0,1,0,3,0,3,0,5,2,3,1,0,1,3,1,3,1,6,4,9,4,5,4,9,4,9,4,13,8,5,1,0,1,5,1,5,1,10,6,13,6,7,6,13,6,13,6,19,12,7,1,0,1,7,1,7,1,14,8,25,16,17,16,25,16,25,16,33,24,18,10,9,10,18,10,18,10,27,19

Here is a graph of this sequence:
I do not think so. :confused:

For example, your sequence contains a whole pile of zeroes, and yet nary-a-one appears in your graph. There's a big problem with the resolution.

beamthegreat said:
1652799208245.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes phinds and robphy
Well, the OP hasn't been here since the post. One can question if even he is interested.
 
  • #10
The OP's horizontal axis is also shifted or mislabeled.
1652800315804.png
 
Back
Top