Uncurving the Universe: Expansion After Big Bang & Energy Loss

evelknee
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Is the expansion of the universe after the big bang just the the "uncurving" of space time from an inconceivable point? And if so, is the loss of energy that curved it that much the only thing that could allow it to "uncurve"? I hate to use the word loss of energy, but I'm not for sure where the energy that could curve the entire universe to a single point could go.

Also, can or has anyone calculated the energy it would take to curve the observable universe in on itself.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what the "uncurving" of spacetime means, nor do I understand the concept of an "inconceivable point" and then to end it off, I have no idea what "curving the universe in on itself" could mean. Can you elaborate on these? Your questions do not seem to make sense but that could well be because I don't understand your terminology.
 
I'm sure it is my lack of understanding and my inability to form coherent questions. I'll try to break it up.We have calculated how much mass it would take to create a black hole where space time is so curved light can't escape.

We have attempted to calculate how much energy it would take to fold space time and create worm holes, and hopefully one day travel to the stars.

Can/has anyone attempted to calculate how much energy it would take to fold or curve the entire observable universe in on itself?

Is expansion as described in the big bang theory the uncurving or unfolding of space time?

And finally, If it is uncurving/unfolding what else could cause this besides a loss of energy or it being transferred to somewhere else?
 
evelknee said:
We have calculated how much mass it would take to create a black hole where space time is so curved light can't escape.
There is no such amount of mass. A black hole can theoretically have any mass. The process forming a black hole is different, but there is no need for a black hole to have a particular mass.

evelknee said:
Can/has anyone attempted to calculate how much energy it would take to fold or curve the entire observable universe in on itself?
It is not clear what you mean by this or how you imagine that this would proceed.

evelknee said:
Is expansion as described in the big bang theory the uncurving or unfolding of space time?
No. It is expansion of space. It is unclear what you mean by uncurving or unfolding, but do realize that it is mainly space-time that is curved. From observations we know that the purely spatial part is essentially flat.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...

Similar threads

Back
Top