Underpinnings of conservation of energy/mass

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the conservation of energy and mass, emphasizing the first law of thermodynamics as a well-supported generalization with no known exceptions. It raises the question of whether other theories depend on the assumption that conservation holds true and what the implications would be if an exception were found. Noether's Theorem is mentioned as a mathematical basis for the conservation of energy, momentum, and angular momentum, while conservation of mass is noted to be less robust, particularly in nuclear reactions. The conversation acknowledges that scientific theories evolve, with past theories sometimes being revised or replaced as new discoveries emerge. Overall, the thread highlights the foundational role of conservation laws in physics and the potential for future challenges to these principles.
Undacuva
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I understand the 1st law of thermodynamics developed as a generalization based on experimental observations, in that an exception has yet to be found in thousands of situations, so it is considered to hold true in all possible situations.
If that is how it developed, is there any other theory or formula which can only hold true if there is no exception to the conservation of energy/mass? If someone does actually prove an exception, what will be the implication (if any) for the rest of what we know about physics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Undacuva said:
I understand the 1st law of thermodynamics developed as a generalization based on experimental observations, in that an exception has yet to be found in thousands of situations, so it is considered to hold true in all possible situations.
If that is how it developed, is there any other theory or formula which can only hold true if there is no exception to the conservation of energy/mass? If someone does actually prove an exception, what will be the implication (if any) for the rest of what we know about physics?
Conservation of energy is also a mathematical consequence of Noether's Theorem and the assumption that the laws of physics are invariant over time (the same now as they were yesterday and will be tomorrow).

Similarly, conservation of momentum follows from the assumption that the laws of physics are invariant over position (same here as they are over there). Conservation of angular momentum follows from the assumption that the laws of physics are invariant with respect to direction (same if one looks one way or if one looks another).

Conservation of mass is not on an equally firm footing. Although energy is conserved, mass (if computed as the sum of the masses of the particles making up a system) is not precisely conserved. The classic example of mass non-conservation in this sense is in a nuclear bomb where the mass of a Uranium atom is greater than the sum of the masses of the remaining pieces after it splits.
 
Conservation of Mass and Energy is a theory. You can use it to make predictions, and so far when such predictions are made, those predictions have proved out. This can be said for all good theories.

As Physics advances, what were held as good theories are sometimes found to be limited. For example, e=mc^2 put a wrinkle in the original conservation of energy theory. Newton's Laws took a hit with the discovery of relativity.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top