Understand Complex Calculus: Diff. & Integ.

  • Thread starter Thread starter rhia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus Complex
AI Thread Summary
Complex differentiation and integration differ significantly from their real counterparts due to the nature of complex functions, which operate in a two-dimensional space. For a function to be complex differentiable, it must satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations, requiring the limit to exist from all directions, not just from above and below as in real analysis. This leads to the property that if a complex function has a continuous derivative, it is also infinitely differentiable or analytic. Integration in the complex domain is more intricate, focusing on summing values along contours rather than just calculating area, utilizing the Riemann-Stieltjes integral for complex line integrals. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for mastering complex calculus.
rhia
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
How is it different from the real differentiation and integration?
There are so many details that I am finding it hard to understand.
Is there a better way to understand especially Integration of Complex functions?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well, the domain is different for a start.

The reason why complex differentiation is special is this:

C is both a "1 parameter space" or it is a 1-d space, whatever, susing C as the groudn field, and it is a 2-d real space.

C = RxR, the set of ordered pairs of real numbers with z = x+iy identified with (x,y)

so when we do lim h tends to 0 of [f(z+h) - f(z)]/h, we can also think in terms of what we want to happen thinking of

f(z) = f(x,y) = u(x,y)+iv(x,y)


there is a whole thread on this in this very subforum. try searching for it.

anyway, it turns out the proper definition for complex differentiation is one where, treating u and v as real valued functions from RxR, we have the cauchy riemann equations satisfied. goolgle for these (include the word wolfram, as ever).
 
One important difference is that the complex plane is two dimensional. In order that a function be differentiable, it must be true that lim_{x->0} \frac{f(x+h)- f(x)}{h} exists. In functions of a real variable, that only means that the two limits "from above" and "from below" must exist. In functions of a complex variable, that means that the limit as you approach from any direction, any line, any curve, must give the same result.
A result of that is that if a function of a complex variable has a continuous derivative it must be infinitely differentiable (actually even more- "analytic").
 
differentiation is easy to explain. A complex valued function ,of a complex variable is equivalent to a function from R^2 to R^2. A derivative is alinear approximation.

If the function is continuiously differentiable in the real sense, then the function is also complex differentiable if and only if the real linear approximation is actually complex linear as well.

integration is alittle more sophisticated. Try to get over thinking of integration as area, and just as adding up something.
 
mathwonk said:
differentiation is easy to explain. A complex valued function ,of a complex variable is equivalent to a function from R^2 to R^2. A derivative is alinear approximation.

If the function is continuiously differentiable in the real sense, then the function is also complex differentiable if and only if the real linear approximation is actually complex linear as well.

integration is alittle more sophisticated. Try to get over thinking of integration as area, and just as adding up something.

It's the Riemann-Stieltjes integral that's needed for complex line integrals (just as it's needed for the ordinary line integrals of vector analysis). On a contour, at a given point z*, we're multiplying the complex number f(z*) by the complex number z**-z* (where z** is a point close to z*: z** = z*+delta z); we sum over all these products over the contour, and then look at the limit as z**-z* tends uniformly to zero, for all z*,z**.

I've seen many introductory books gloss over these small technical problems, and treat the complex integral as an exact analogue of our chum the Riemann integral.
 
hey mathwonk and hallsofivy u are both good, send a private 2 me u both
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top