Understand Hooke's Law and Spring Dynamics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the dynamics of a spring when an object with an initial velocity collides with it, specifically regarding the time it takes for the spring to compress. It highlights that the motion becomes simple harmonic after the impact, allowing the use of simple harmonic motion (SHM) equations to determine the compression time. The effect of gravity is also emphasized, noting that it alters the energy dynamics when the object is bouncing vertically, as both kinetic and gravitational potential energy must be considered. The derived formula for the time to maximum compression indicates it is dependent solely on the mass of the object and the spring constant, not on the object's initial velocity. This analysis clarifies the relationship between Hooke's Law, energy conservation, and the behavior of springs under varying conditions.
daveed
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
allright, here is something i haven't been able to understand with just hooke's law

if i have an object traveling at velocity v, let's say, 4m/s , and hits a spring at, i don't know, k=2? so then we know how far the spring compresses and all because you just need to set the work done and kinetic energy equal, but what i have not been able to get is how long does it take for it to compress? because with a changing force(and so a changing acceleration), i don't understand how to find the time it takes to stop the thing

also, when your talking about a ball bouncing up and hitting a spring, the compression would not be the same as if it had happened on a horizontal surface, because gravity would also be doing work on the ball too, right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
if the object comes and hits the spring again(after being pulled down by gravity) and hits the spring out of phase, will you still need to take the work done by the spring? also, what if it- let's take this with a spring vibrating up and down now- hits the spring above the equillibrium point, where the force on the end of the spring is downwards? how does the object behave then?
 
daveed said:
also, when your talking about a ball bouncing up and hitting a spring, the compression would not be the same as if it had happened on a horizontal surface, because gravity would also be doing work on the ball too, right?

YES, of course the compression will be diffrent because of the gravity's force...
In this situation you don't only have kinetic energy but you have the gravity potential energy as well. The equation will be this then .5kx^2=.5mV2+mgh (in the vertical bouncing)...
but if it ball is traveling a horizontal distance you don't have gravity's potential energy hence the x would be less...

I hope I realized your question correctly..
 
daveed said:
allright, here is something i haven't been able to understand with just hooke's law

if i have an object traveling at velocity v, let's say, 4m/s , and hits a spring at, i don't know, k=2? so then we know how far the spring compresses and all because you just need to set the work done and kinetic energy equal, but what i have not been able to get is how long does it take for it to compress? because with a changing force(and so a changing acceleration), i don't understand how to find the time it takes to stop the thing

also, when your talking about a ball bouncing up and hitting a spring, the compression would not be the same as if it had happened on a horizontal surface, because gravity would also be doing work on the ball too, right?

F=-kx(t)=m\frac{d^2x(t)}{dt^2} (Newtons second law F=ma)

This is a differential equation with the general solution:
x(t)=Asin(\omega t)+Bcos(\omega t)

With \omega=\sqrt{k/m}[/tex]. Applying initial conditions; say x(t=0)=0<br /> x(t)=Asin(\omega t)<br /> <br /> The spring is totally compressed when:<br /> sin(\omega t)=1 so t=\frac{\pi}{2 \omega}=\frac{\pi}{2} \sqrt{m/k}<br /> <br /> And thus depends only on the mass of the object and the spring constant and not on the initial velocity of the object!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Back
Top