What Are the Best Introductory Physics Resources for a High School Freshman?

  • Thread starter Thread starter A GUY
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basics Physics
AI Thread Summary
To grasp the basics of physics, particularly for a high school freshman, a strong foundation in mathematics is essential, with an emphasis on algebra and calculus. Recommended resources include "Physics for Scientists and Engineers" by Tipler, though it may be advanced, and "How Things Work" by Louis Bloomfield for a conceptual understanding. It's advised to pair algebra-based physics books, such as Giancolli's "Physics: Principles with Applications," with more conceptual texts to enhance comprehension. Engaging with simulations, like those from the University of Colorado's Phet site, and conducting hands-on experiments can further solidify understanding. Mastery of high school mathematics, including algebra, index manipulations, logarithms, and graph analysis, is crucial before delving deeper into physics concepts.
A GUY
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Dear All,

I have you aware that I'm new here,and currently a high school freshman.

I'd actually like to learn some introductory materials needed to understand the basics of physics. Any recommendations? ~A GUY
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I'd focus on a lot of Newtonian mechanics as it sets the framework for the rest of physics to varying extents. Physics for Scientists and Engineers (Tipler) is very good but you may find advanced. As I'm in the UK I can't recommend many books as I don't know what's available in your country, but a great many books on mechanics have been written!

Perhaps just focus on what you learn at school?

Remember that the language of physics is mathematics, especially calculus, any work you can do on calculus will be highly beneficial and it's where I would start.
 


How much math and physics do you know already?

You must master algebra, and then calculus, to study physics seriously. To learn about the basics on a conceptual level, you might be able to do without calculus, but in any case algebra is a must.
 


I agree with the above by uman, In my last post I assumed you knew the basics of high school maths but yest you must certainly have a good mastery of :algebra,index manipulations,logarithms (v.related to index manipulations) and graph analysis, then move on to calculus. If these are not familiar to you your maths teacher at school will be able to help.
 


There are also some good non-mathematics physics books out there (more on the terms of "physical science / conceptual physics." At the college-level, I use "How Things Work" by Louis Bloomfield... and there's also "The Flying Circus of Physics" by Jearl Walker (Maybe it's just the edition I used back in the 90's, but I'm not so fond of Hewitt's "Conceptual Physics").

At this stage in your career, I'd suggest pairing one of these kind of books with an algebra-based book (maybe like Giancolli's "Physics: Principles with applications", even though I'm not 100% happy with it). Read back and forth between the two, so that you more fully understand the concepts with the math (try to balance these -- too often early students of physics think it's "just" another math course, while I think it's really more beautiful than that).

Furthermore, make use of some simulations (the University of Colorado "Phet" site has many simulations specifically designed to go with the Bloomfield text, which they also use), design your own experiments and make measurements (there's fun books out there on this kind of thing), and even try to build some stuff (motors, bridges, design mobiles etc.)
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?
Back
Top