Understanding 2D and 3D Elastic Collisions: Solving Analytical Problems

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on solving analytical problems related to 2D and 3D elastic collisions. In the 2D case, there are four variables (x and y components of velocity for two bodies) and three equations (two for conservation of momentum and one for conservation of energy). The fourth equation is derived from the geometry of the collision, specifically the direction of momentum change. In the 3D case, six variables and four equations are present, with the tangential velocity components remaining unchanged during the collision.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservation of momentum and energy principles
  • Familiarity with vector components in physics
  • Knowledge of collision geometry and angles
  • Basic proficiency in solving systems of equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of equations for 2D elastic collisions
  • Learn about the geometric interpretation of momentum changes in collisions
  • Explore 3D collision dynamics and the role of tangential components
  • Investigate simulation tools for visualizing elastic collisions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and collision theory, as well as educators seeking to explain elastic collision concepts effectively.

Omri
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have recently been interested in the problem of 2- and 3-dimensional elastic collisions. I just don't understand how to solve these problems analytically: in the 2D case we have 4 variables (x,y components of the velocity times 2 bodies) and only 3 equations (2 conservation of momentum, 1 conservation of energy); in the 3D case (similarly) we have 6 variables and only 4 equtions.
I ran across this page: http://www.plasmaphysics.org.uk/collision2d.htm
but I stopped understanding when they started talking about theta as the sum of two other angles.
I would be happy if somebody could explain it to me.

Thanks a lot! :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the 2D case, the "fourth equation" comes from the fact that you know the direction of the momentum change, from the geometry of the collision.

Resolve the velocities along the line of impact and tangential to it. The two tangential velocity components don't change, because there is no impact force in the tangential direction.

Apply conservation of momentum and energy along the line of impact: that gives two equations to find the other two velocity components.

In 3D there there are no velocity changes in the plane tangent to the impact, so 4 components of velocity don't change. Again, the two conservation equations give the two velocities along the line of impact.
 
I more or less get the idea, but the equations in the webpage (again, starting from the weird angles equations) sort of confused me.
Could you please explain what happened there mathematically (I'm referring to the 2D case)?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K