Understanding Binding Energy: The Hidden Mass Conversion Process

weltza
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
The mass of the hydrogen atom is smaller than the sum of the masses of a proton and an electron. The mass difference is converted into binding energy. Mass was converted, and you know where it went (into binding energy). Where did the mass come from, the electron or proton??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mass was not converted into energy.
The mass of a hydrogen atom is M_hyd=M_p +m_e +U_binding,
with U_binding=-13.6 eV.
 
did the binding energy come from the proton or the electron, is what I'm asking.
 
What clem is saying is "neither". There are three terms in his expression, and it comes from the third term.
 
The binding energy comes from the interaction of both the electron and the proton. Togehter they'll draw each other down into a potential, and since Energy = mass, the total system will have mass less than mass of lone constituents.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top