Understanding Bounded Intervals to Suprema and Infima

  • Thread starter Thread starter Icebreaker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bounded intervals
AI Thread Summary
If I and J are bounded intervals, their intersection I ∩ J is also bounded. The discussion highlights the complexity of using suprema and infima to demonstrate this property. It suggests that there may be simpler methods to prove the boundedness of the intersection. Specifically, it notes that the maximum of the upper bounds of I and J serves as an upper bound for I ∩ J, while a similar approach applies for lower bounds. This approach simplifies the proof without the need for intricate definitions.
Icebreaker
"If I and J are bounded, then I\capJ is also bounded."

Now, I was able to do this using the definition of suprema and infima and so fourth, but it is one godawful mess. I could sumbit it as is, but I was wondering if there's an easier way.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why would you involve suprema and infima?

Let C be an upper bound of I, and D an upper bound of J. Then max{C, D} is an upper bound of I \cap J. Similarly for the lower bound.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top