Understanding Capacitor Discharge in Ideal and Real Circuits

  • Thread starter Thread starter ledin12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitor
AI Thread Summary
In circuits with an ideal capacitor and cell, the capacitor discharges to zero potential difference when the cell is removed, leading to a theoretical 0/0 capacitance scenario. However, capacitance is defined as charge per potential difference, and this relationship does not apply at the 0/0 point. A capacitor retains its charge when disconnected from a circuit, only discharging when connected to another device, such as a resistor. Real capacitors discharge very slowly due to leakage currents, even with good insulation. The discussion emphasizes that capacitance should be understood in terms of charge and potential difference rather than specific values at discharge.
ledin12
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Consider the hypothetical situation.
In a circuit with a capacitor and an ideal cell, potential difference across the capacitor would be the potential difference maintained by the cell. If the ideal cell is removed leaving the only the capacitor in the circuit without any resistance in the circuit, the capacitor would become discharged and finally charge on capacitor would be 0 and thus potential difference would be 0. Now since Capacitance=charge/potential difference, the capacitance would be 0/0? Am i right?
Or if the cell is real charge would only approach 0 and hence potential difference too would approach 0 and hence C approaches 0/0? Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The capacitor discharges only if it is not perfect and can conduct somehow or has other ways to discharge.

"Capacitance=charge/potential difference" is a relation between values the capacitor can have, not the current values. A better way would be to define "capacitance (at a specific potential difference) is the derivative of the charge with respect to a change of the potential difference".
 
Capacitor does not discharge when it is disconnected after charging.It discharges only when there is another capacitor or any other electronic device(resistor,semiconductor,etc) attached to it.As Q=CV,here V is not zero,it is same as that of the battery that was connected before and Q is the maximum amount of charge that the capacitor can store in it.
Therefore C=charge stored/potential across the capacitor plates.

A simple experiment to show you that capacitor does not discharge when disconnected is,
take a capacitor and connect it to a potential source.Then disconnect it and keep it for some time(even a day).Then connect a small LED to it,and the LED will glow.This shows that capacitor does not discharge when disconnected from any other conductors/semiconductors.
 
Real capacitor does discharge on its own, but very, very slowly. There is going to be some current between plates even with best of insulators, there is going to be some current due to ions in the air, etc. You can't insulate the plates perfectly.

But it's kind of irrelevant to the question. Defining capacitance as C=q/V is really talking more about slope rather than any specific value. You'd never take the (0,0) point to measure a slope of the line for the same reason you don't take the 0/0 point here. It doesn't define the value.
 
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top