Understanding Car Suspension Equations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the equations related to half suspension systems, particularly focusing on their dynamics and symmetry. The equations model vehicle dynamics based on suspension parameters, assuming symmetry between the left and right sides. A key point of confusion is the presence of the coefficient '2' in equation two, which is explained by the model's assumption of two tires on each side. Participants note that while the equations are a good starting point, the complexity of real-world dynamics requires further exploration beyond this simple model. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for a deeper understanding of the equations and their applications in vehicle suspension.
Kammy1234
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi

Im trying to revise up on half suspension systems and I found this useful link. Their are 4 equations but I was wondering if someone could explain the equations for me (as it just tells you what they are without giving any understanding) especially equation 1.


http://www.mathworks.com/products/s...s/demos/shipping/simulink/sldemo_suspn.html#1

Thanks for any help
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What is it exactly you don't understand about the equations? They are pretty clear. All four of the equations model the dynamics of the vehicle itself based on the suspension parameters and its positions. Keep in mind that this is only a simple 2-dimensional analysis and assumes the driver and passenger side suspension parameters and displacement are symmetrical.
 
Hi, thanks for replying.


I suppose the real problem for me is why in eqwuation two is the coefficient '2' in both cases. You only have one spring, only have one dmaper on the left hand side - same for the right hand side, yet it shows 2 as the coeficient?
 
Because the model assumes symmetry. You have 2 tires in the front, and 2 tires in the back.
 
good start ! shows elementary working of simple suspension..many dynamic variables need to be addressed but good effort
 
studying the diagram, i think it was been discuss thoroughly. by the way i think the best person to understand that diagram aside from the mechncal engineer, i think it can be understand by auto repair shops mechanics. i guess.
 
i see that the horizontal distance is multiplied directly by the pitch angle... shouldn't there be some sort of trigonometry involved?
 
Back
Top