Understanding Chiral Theory & Its Significance

alphaone
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
Could somebody please tell me a workable definition of the term "chiral theory" , and also explain its significance? As far as I know, in a chiral theory not all the fermions obtain a mass but whether this is a definition or a derived result is not clear to me. Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As to me, the term "chiral" is associated with spinors. There are 2-spinors and 4-spinors. 2-spinors are also known as Weyl spinors or chiral spinors. 4-spinors are composed of 2-spinors and their Hermitian conjugates. 4-spinors are also known as Dirac spinors. See more details in my papers

http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0602359
http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0601262
 
alphaone said:
Could somebody please tell me a workable definition of the term "chiral theory" , and also explain its significance? As far as I know, in a chiral theory not all the fermions obtain a mass but whether this is a definition or a derived result is not clear to me. Thanks in advance

The basic idea is the following. For spin 1/2 fermions, you may define separately left-handed and right-handed states. What I mean by this is that those are well-defined representations of the Lorentz group so they can be used as "building blocks" of a theory. A theory that treats differently the left-handed and right-handed states of the fermions is said to be chiral. By "treating" differently I mean that the terms in the lagrangian are not symmetric under exchanging the left and right handed spinors.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top