Understanding Color Factors in Eq. 8.45-8.46

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter spookyfish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Color Factors
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The transition from Eq. (8.45) to Eq. (8.46) in Griffiths' text is justified by the commutation of color factors with spinor-space matrices due to their existence in distinct spaces. Specifically, the color vectors \( c_i \) reside in color space, while the Dirac spinors \( u(i) \) exist in spinor space. By employing explicit indices for both the Dirac spinors and color vectors, one can demonstrate that all quantities commute as they reduce to numerical values. This clarification resolves the initial confusion regarding the factorization of \( c_3^\dagger \lambda^\alpha c_1 \) from the expression.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Dirac spinors and matrices
  • Familiarity with color space and color factors in quantum field theory
  • Knowledge of matrix commutation relations
  • Proficiency in tensor notation and index manipulation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of color space in quantum chromodynamics (QCD)
  • Learn about the role of Dirac matrices in quantum field theory
  • Explore the implications of commutation relations in particle physics
  • Review tensor calculus and index notation for advanced physics applications
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on quantum field theory, particle physics, and the mathematical foundations of color charge and spinor interactions.

spookyfish
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Hi. I was reading Griffiths page 289 and I wasn't sure how the transition from Eq. (8.45) to (8.46) was allowed. What bothers me is factoring out the "color factors" since the c's are vectors, and generally the elements of these color factors are matrices. For example, how is it allowed to pull out [itex]c_3^\dagger \lambda^\alpha c_1[/itex] out of [itex]\bar{u}(3)c_3^\dagger \lambda^\alpha \gamma^\mu u(1) c_1[/itex]. Is it because the color factors live in a different space (color space) so they commute with spinor-space matrices?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, the color vectors [itex]c_i[/itex] live in a space different from that of the Dirac spinors [itex]u(i)[/itex]. If you still feel uncomfortable you can always use explicit indices: the Dirac spinors and the Dirac matrices have indices, say, i,j,k and the color vectors and the color generators have indices, say, a,b,c. Once the indices are explicit all the quantities commute with each other since they are just numbers. Then, for example:
$$
\bar u(3)c_3^\dagger\lambda^\alpha\gamma_\mu u(1)c_1=\bar u_i(3)c_{3a}^\dagger\lambda^\alpha_{ab}\gamma_{\mu}^{ij}u_j(1)c_{1b}= \bar u_i(3)\gamma_\mu^{ij}u_j(1)c_{3a}^\dagger\lambda_{ab}^\alpha c_{1b}=(\bar u(3)\gamma_\mu u(1))(c_3^\dagger\lambda^\alpha c_1).
$$
I hope this answer your question.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
yes, thank you
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
7K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
95
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K