Why doesn't √-1×√-1 always equal 1 in complex numbers?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies that the expression √-1 × √-1 does not equal 1 due to the properties of complex numbers. It explains that √-5 equals i√5, leading to the conclusion that √-5 × √-5 equals -5, not 5. The rule √a × √b = √(ab) is only valid for nonnegative real numbers, which does not apply in this case. Therefore, i^2 equals -1, reinforcing the distinction between real and complex number operations. Understanding these principles is crucial for correctly handling complex numbers.
Gourav kumar Lakhera
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
As we know that √-5×√-5=5 i.e multiplication with it self
My question is that according to this √-1×√-1=1.but it does not hold good in case of i(complex number).
I.e i^2 =-1. Why?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Gourav kumar Lakhera said:
As we know that √-5×√-5=5
No, this is not true. ##\sqrt{-5} = i\sqrt{5}## so ##\sqrt{-5} \cdot \sqrt{-5} = i^2 (\sqrt{5})^2 = -5##, not 5 as you show above.
Gourav kumar Lakhera said:
i.e multiplication with it self
My question is that according to this √-1×√-1=1
This isn't true, either, for the same reason as above.
Gourav kumar Lakhera said:
.but it does not hold good in case of i(complex number).
I.e i^2 =-1. Why?

You are apparently using the rule that ##\sqrt a \sqrt b = \sqrt{ab}##. That rule holds only when both a and b are nonnegative real numbers.
 
Thnkuu buddy
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...

Similar threads

3
Replies
108
Views
10K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top