Understanding Complex Numbers as Parametric Functions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding complex numbers represented as parametric functions in the complex plane. Participants are examining how to sketch these functions and the implications of interpreting complex numbers in a parametric context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to determine the correct way to represent a given parametric function in the complex plane for sketching purposes. They question whether setting specific equations for x(t) and y(t) is appropriate. Other participants provide confirmation and further explore the implications of plotting complex numbers as parametric functions.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the topic, with some providing guidance on how to approach the sketching of the parametric functions. There is an ongoing exploration of the interpretation of complex numbers as parametric functions, with questions about the validity of this perspective being raised.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion among participants regarding the interpretation of complex numbers as parametric functions, indicating a need for clarification on this conceptual approach.

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi all.

I am given the following parametric function in the complex plane C:

[tex] \gamma = \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}c}<br /> {t^2 + it\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\rm{for }}\,\,t \in [0,1]} \\<br /> {t + i\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\rm{for }}\,\,t \in ]1,2]} \\<br /> \end{array}} \right.[/tex]

In order to sketch it for t in [0,1], will it be correct it I set x(t) = t2 and y(t) = t, and sketch it in the real plane?

Thanks in advance.Niles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Niles said:

Homework Statement


Hi all.

I am given the following parametric function in the complex plane C:

[tex] \gamma = \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}c}<br /> {t^2 + it\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\rm{for }}\,\,t \in [0,1]} \\<br /> {t + i\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\rm{for }}\,\,t \in ]1,2]} \\<br /> \end{array}} \right.[/tex]

In order to sketch it for t in [0,1], will it be correct it I set x(t) = t2 and y(t) = t, and sketch it in the real plane?

Thanks in advance.


Niles.
For [itex]0\le t\le 1[/itex], yes. For [itex]1< t\le 2[/itex], x= t, y= 1. Draw those two pieces.
 
Thanks.

Lets look at e.g. w = z2 = r2ei2K = r2(cos(2K) + isin(2K)), where K is the argument of z and r is the modulus. If I wish to plot w = z2, then can I do this by plotting x(t) = r2cos(2K) and y(t) = r2sin(2K) as well?Niles.
 
The reason why I am asking is that I seem to get confused when I look at complex numbers as mere parametric functions. Is it correct to look at them in this sense?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K