Understanding Core Loss Measurement

AI Thread Summary
Measuring core loss in RF transformers and inductors can be complex, particularly with the equations presented in a referenced PhD thesis. The original poster struggled with equation 3.1, questioning the dependence of Pcore on capital Ipp versus lower-case ipp and the role of duty cycle D. Clarification revealed a typo in the equation where Ipp should actually be ipp, which resolved some confusion. Additionally, it was explained that duty cycles away from 50% increase harmonic amplitudes, leading to higher core losses. Understanding these nuances is crucial for accurate core loss measurement.
reson8r
Messages
6
Reaction score
2
Hello folks,

I'm looking for a way to measure core loss in RF transformers and inductors. I found a PhD thesis here:
https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/19296/Mu_M_D_2013.pdf
which looks like just the ticket, but I'm having trouble understanding key parts. I've tried contacting the author with no success.

Chapter 3 introduces a good practical method, but I'm stumped at eqn 3.1 (pg 66).
  • Why does Pcore depend on capital Ipp and not lower-case ipp? Capital Ipp results from the magnetizing inductance (Lm in fig 3.1), but lower-case ipp is the current step due to core loss.
  • Why does Pcore depend on duty cycle D? Driving fig 3.1 with a rectangular wave would result in a rectangular voltage across Rcore, so the power loss in Rcore shouldn't depend on D at all.
  • Not only do I not understand why D is in there, I don't see how its use in eqn 3.1 is derived.
In short, I pretty much don't get eqn 3.1 at all! If anyone can help, I would greatly appreciate it. Then perhaps eqn 3.2 will start making sense...

Gerrit
 
I've gotten to the bottom of this, with some help from elsewhere. There is indeed a typo in eqn 3.1 -- Ipp should be ipp. And page 23 of the paper does touch on core loss dependency on D. Duty cycles away from 50% contain higher harmonic amplitudes, which contribute to higher core loss. That makes sense!
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Back
Top