Understanding Cross Products and Angular Momentum in Vector Calculus

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding cross products and angular momentum within the context of vector calculus. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the interpretation of the magnitude of the cross product and its relation to area, as well as the notation used for angular momentum.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions the interpretation of the magnitude of the cross product as an area and expresses uncertainty about the notation for angular momentum (J vs. L). Other participants provide insights into the nature of angular momentum and the properties of cross products, while some suggest not to overthink the dimensional aspects.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring various interpretations of the cross product and its implications for angular momentum. Some guidance has been offered regarding the properties of the cross product and the relationship between different forms of angular momentum, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

The original poster indicates a lack of familiarity with quantum mechanics, which may contribute to their confusion regarding the notation for angular momentum. There is also a mention of the need to consider the physical meaning of the quantities involved in angular momentum.

Tomsk
Messages
227
Reaction score
0
I hope this is the right forum, this is mostly about maths, I'm not looking for a physical interpretation of angular momentum... yet. It also involves *some* calc... anyway...

OK, firstly, I've come to the conclusion I don't get cross products. I understand the properties of them, and can use them OK, there's just something I came across that I don't get. Say you have [itex]\vec{a}\times\vec{b}=\vec{c}[/itex]. Apparently, the magnitude of c is given by the area of the parallelogram formed by a and b. I'm ok with the product axb having units of area, but when you then go and say c has a length that is an area... I get a bit lost. How am I supposed to interpret that?

Actually, scrap the second part, I'm an idiot!

Oh, and my lecturer always seemed to swap between J and L, both apparently for angular momentum. They mean the same thing, right? Or have I completely not understood anything??:cry:

I'll be back. I hate angular momentum.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This kinda looks pointless now, I should always think through a problem thoroughly before looking for help on here! I still don't get the first bit about cross products though.
 
J is the 'total' angular momentum, which is a coupling of the orbital angular momentum and the spin angular momentum.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angular_momentum_coupling#LS_coupling

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/qangm.html
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/vecmod.html

As for the cross product -

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/vvec.html

If vrectors a,b had dimensions of length, then in a x b = c, c would have magnitude of area, and vector would be parallel to the normal of the area.

When we do v x B for the Lorentz force, the resulting vector has units of T-m/s, which have to be equivalent to N/C, since F = q(v x B).

See also - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross_product#Geometric_meaning
 
Last edited:
Think about what quantities angular momentum contains, i.e., what information is the angular momentum vector composed of; the scalar quantity - mass, the vector quantities - velocity and position. Isn't it a intuitive need to know what mass a particle has, where it is located, and what it's velocity is?

Regarding the area/length affare - I wouldn't loose my head thinking about that too much if I were you. The vector c = a x b can have any physical meaning, so it's dimension can be length, velocity, acceleration, force, etc. It's absolute value always equals the area of the a x b paralelogram, but that doesn't mean the dimensions equal, too.
 
Thanks guys. I've not done any QM yet, maybe my lecturer was crossing between J and L subconciously. I think I see the connection, sort of! I can accept the thing about the magnitude of the cross product too, it kinda caught me off guard! Thanks again. :D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K