Understanding Current: Definition and Comparison to Math-Defined Current

AI Thread Summary
Current is defined as the rate at which charge crosses a surface boundary over time, expressed mathematically as I=dQ/dt. The confusion arises when interpreting this as a change in charge, which can seem to equal zero since charge entering and leaving a conductor balances out. However, current should be viewed as a flow rate, similar to water flowing through a pipe, rather than a measure of change in total charge. The distinction between I=dQ/dt (instantaneous flow rate) and I=Q/t (average flow over time) is crucial for understanding the concept of current. Clarifying the terminology from "change" to "flow" helps resolve the misunderstanding.
Nikitin
Messages
734
Reaction score
27
This is a very sound stupid question, but I'll go ahead anyway.

Current is defined as the displacement of charge through a cross-section of a conductor per unit time. Okay. But how does relate to its math-definition, current = change of charge with respect to time, I=dQ/dt? I mean, for every charge leaving the cross-section of the conductor, an equivalent one will enter. This means that across the cross-section dQ/dt, the summed change of charge with respect to time, equals 0!

I find I = Q/t, current = amount of charge passing the cross-section per unit time, a much more intuitive definition..

So can you guys help me make sense of this?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes person_random_normal
Physics news on Phys.org
define a surface boundary. it doesn't have to be a closed surface, but it may be (and if it is, then continuity applies). electric current is defined to be the rate (w.r.t. time) that charge is crossing from one side of that surface boundary to the other. nothing else.

if the surface is closed, then continuity requires that the negative of the rate of amount of charge contained inside the closed surface is equal to the current crossing that boundary from inside to out.
 
for every charge leaving the cross-section of the conductor, an equivalent one will enter.

The water analogy for electricity isn't perfect but in effect you are saying..

"for every CC of water leaving the pipe an equivalent amount will enter"

That's true.

However electric current is equivalent to the flow rate of the water through the pipe not the change in volume of water in the pipe.

I=dQ/dt is equivalent to measuring the instantaneous flow rate of the water.

I=Q/t would be more akin to measuring the amount of water used over say a year and dividing acccordingly to give the average flow rate over that period.. or perhaps the total amount of water that has ever flowed through the pipe divided by the age of the pipe.
 
Last edited:
Nikitin said:
This is a very sound stupid question, but I'll go ahead anyway.

Current is defined as the displacement of charge through a cross-section of a conductor per unit time. Okay. But how does relate to its math-definition, current = change of charge with respect to time, I=dQ/dt? I mean, for every charge leaving the cross-section of the conductor, an equivalent one will enter. This means that across the cross-section dQ/dt, the summed change of charge with respect to time, equals 0!

I find I = Q/t, current = amount of charge passing the cross-section per unit time, a much more intuitive definition..

So can you guys help me make sense of this?

That word is where your problem lies. If you substitute the word 'flow' then your worry ceases to be.
 
thanks!
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top