dglee said:
well opz i mean |sin(x)| is not differentiable at pi 2pi and 2npi. ok i understand now that |x| is continuous everywhere but can not be diff at 0 because we can not estimate a slope at x=0.
Yes |sin(x)| is again everywhere continuous, but is not differentiable at [itex]x = k \pi, \ k \in \mathbb{Z}[/itex].
---------------------
A function is differentiable at x
0 iff:
[tex]\lim_{h \rightarrow 0 ^ +} \frac{f(x_0 + h) - f(x_0)}{h} = \lim_{h \rightarrow 0 ^ -} \frac{f(x_0 + h) - f(x_0)}{h}[/tex], ie the limit is the same no matter how h tends to 0 (in other words, no matter how x tends to x
0) (from the left or from the right).
(|1+h|-1)/h thus always = to 1 for all h
This is again wrong. What if h = -2?
but however you can not plug 0 in or you will get an undefined function?? you know is it possible to do l'hospital's rule? on absolute value limits? i hate absolute values... now its becoming clearer this is sad I am an applied mathematics student... this is sad lol. and I am a 2nd yr as well.
You must first understand the definition of limit, look it up in your book. It's important because differentiation is based heavily on limit.
If you say [tex]\lim_{x \rightarrow \alpha} \mbox{some expression} = L[/tex], it does not mean that you take [itex]x = \alpha[/itex] and plug it in the expression, it will return you L. It means that as x tends to [itex]\alpha[/itex] (close to [itex]\alpha[/itex], but not [itex]x = \alpha[/itex]), the expression: [tex]\mbox{some expression}[/tex] will tends to L.
In other word, we are allow to freely choose an [itex]\varepsilon > 0[/itex] (no matter how small it is), there
must be a neighbourhood of [itex]\alpha[/itex], that
if x is in that neighbourhood,
then [tex]\left| \mbox{some expression} - L \right| < \varepsilon[/tex]. Or, equivalently:
[tex]\forall \varepsilon > 0, \exists \delta > 0 : \mbox{ if } 0 < |x_0 - \alpha| < \delta \mbox{ then } \left| \mbox{some expression} - L \right| < \varepsilon[/tex].
Do you understand this?
So if you plan to say that:
[tex]\lim_{h \rightarrow 0} \frac{|1 + h| - 1}{h} = \frac{|1 + 0| - 1}{0}[/tex], then you are wrong!
As h
tends to 0, both numerator, and denominator
tend to 0. That yields the
indeterminate form [tex]\frac{0}{0}[/tex].
(If it's not an
indeterminate form, then you can take [itex]x = \alpha[/itex], and plug in the expression, but in this case, since it's one of the
indeterminate forms, you
can't).
But before you take the limit, let's answer some questions:
1. As h tends to 0 what does |1 + h| tend to?
2. Is it positive, negative, or depends on the way h tends to 0?
3. So as h tends to 0, |1 + h| = ? (Is it |1 + h| = 1 + h, or |1 + h| = -1 - h)?
Number 3 can be answered after you have answered number 1, and 2.
From there, I think you can solve the problem. Can you?
