Understanding Displacement Current: The Physical Explanation Behind the Concept

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of displacement current as introduced by James Clerk Maxwell, emphasizing its role in electromagnetic theory despite the absence of the ether concept. Participants clarify that displacement current refers to the relationship between changing electric fields and their associated magnetic fields, rather than a physical current. The equation D = εoE + P is highlighted, illustrating how an applied electric field E polarizes a dielectric, leading to an internal electric field P. The conservation of charge is crucial in understanding this phenomenon, as demonstrated through the manipulation of Maxwell's equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maxwell's equations
  • Familiarity with dielectric materials and electric susceptibility (χ)
  • Knowledge of electromagnetic theory
  • Basic calculus for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Maxwell's equations from classical electromagnetism
  • Explore the concept of electric displacement field (D) in detail
  • Investigate the implications of charge conservation in electromagnetic fields
  • Read "Relativity Demystified" by McMahon for insights on the historical context of displacement current
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in advanced electromagnetic theory and the historical development of Maxwell's equations.

Apteronotus
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
When Maxwell first described the displacement current, he rationalized it with imagining space filled with ether. We now know that ether does not exist. So the question remains what is the rationalization behind displacement current?

Wikipedia states "... It is now believed that displacement current does not exist as a real current (movement of charge)... The present day concept of displacement current therefore simply refers to the fact that a changing electric field has an associated magnetic field..."

I have a hard time accepting the term on the basis that it makes the equations work. I guess I need to know what the physical reasoning is behind the term. What physical phenomenon is it describing?
Can anyone help me understand this?

Thanks,

ps. the best explanation I have been able to come up with follows. Please feel free to correct or confirm this.

When an electric field E is applied to a dielectric (any non conducting substance), the actual field that is present inside the dielectric is given by the equation D = εoE+P.

The applied field E causes the atoms of the dielectric to polarize. The polarized atoms form an internal electric field P. Of course the value of this field is determined by the particular media and its electric susceptibility χ. The direction of P would generally be opposite that of E.

The idea is that the displacement field in regions of matter is composed of the "matter-free" field εoE, and an additional contribution from the matter, P.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Physically, this is really a consequence of conservation of charge

<br /> \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} + \nabla \cdot \vec{J} = 0<br />

If you start with the pre-Maxwell Ampere law

<br /> \nabla \times \vec{B} = \mu_0 \vec{J}<br />

and Gauss's law

<br /> \nabla \cdot \vec{E} = \rho/\epsilon_0<br />

some manipulation will show that the conservation of charge does not hold. The book "Relativity Demystified", by McMahon on pages 2-3 has a nice walk through of the arithmetic to demonstrate this.

Note that the book above is actually a GR book, but happens to start off with a very clear motivation of this fix-up of Ampere's law by Maxwell.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
948
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
50K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K