Understanding E and Z Isomerism in 3-Isopropyl-2-Heptene

  • Thread starter Thread starter leopard
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Isomerism
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the isomerism of 3-isopropyl-2-heptene, specifically whether it is classified as E or Z. There is a disagreement regarding the priority of the groups attached to the double bond, with one participant asserting that the book's classification as Z is incorrect. They argue that the left side of the molecule clearly shows which group has higher priority, while the right side's priority is debated due to the length of the carbon chain. The conversation emphasizes the importance of examining the groups directly bonded to the first carbon for accurate classification. Ultimately, the correct identification of the isomer hinges on understanding these priority rules.
leopard
Messages
123
Reaction score
0
Is this the E or Z isomer of 3-isopropyl-2-heptene?

1538enn.jpg


My book says Z, but I would think it's E. On the left, there is no doubt which group has higher priority. I would believe that on the right side, the lower group has the higher priority because there is a longer chain of C-atoms.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
one of the priorities is wrong. take a look at what is bonded DIRECTLY NEXT TO the first carbon
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top