Understanding Einstein Notation

schwarzschild
Messages
14
Reaction score
1
I thought that when you used a roman letter such as v that you started at 1 instead of 0. For instance if you had:
A^v C_{\mu v}

Wouldn't that just be: A^1C_{\mu 1} + A^2C_{\mu 2} + A^3C_{\mu 3} ?

(this is one of the problems with a solution from Schutz's book and the solution starts with v = 0 )
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure its not a \nu instead of a v?
 
I think in many notations the index normally represents a 4-vector(though it doesn't HAVE to be 4 dimensions), which in some(most?) notations start with 0. Any pairs of indices just implies a sum. I think for everything I've ever done the first index is 0 rather than 1.
 
Wow! Thanks for pointing that out - the two are confusingly similar in appearance :biggrin:.
 
schwarzschild said:
Wow! Thanks for pointing that out - the two are confusingly similar in appearance :biggrin:.

Usually Latin indicies start i,j,k ... if the author has indicated a different convention between Latin and Greek indecies.
 
A lot of older books use the convention that Latin versus Greek indices indicates spacelike indices versus ones that range over all four dimensions. The convention you'll see more commonly in newer books is to use abstract index notation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_index_notation , with Latin indices indicating that they're abstract indices, Greek meaning that they refer to a particular basis.
 
  • Like
Likes cianfa72
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top