Understanding Electromagnetic Transitions: |ΔI|=1, ΔIz=0

  • Thread starter Thread starter LayMuon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electromagnetic
LayMuon
Messages
149
Reaction score
1
We know that electromagnetic current can be written as j^{\mu}_{em} = \frac{1}{6} \bar{Q} \gamma^\mu Q + \bar{Q} \gamma^\mu \frac{\tau^3}{2} Q where Q = \begin{pmatrix} u \\ d \end{pmatrix}. We say this induces a transition with |\Delta I|=1, \Delta I_z =0. What should we understand under that last statement? How do we see that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It means that the hadronic em-current (to lowest order in e) contains a part which transforms like a SCALAR ( iso-scalar, I = 0) under SU(2) and a part which transforms like the 3rd component of an ISO-VECTOR (I = 1 , I_{ 3 } = 0):
<br /> J^{ \mu }_{ \mbox{ em } } ( x ) = J^{ \mu }_{ \mbox{ em } , I = 0 } ( x ) + J^{ \mu }_{ \mbox{ em } , I = 1 , I_{ 3 } = 0 } ( x ) <br />
or
<br /> J^{ \mu }_{ \mbox{ em } } ( x ) = S^{ \mu } ( x ) + V^{ \mu }_{ 3 } ( x )<br />
The two pieces are separately conserved, reflecting conservation of Baryon number and 3rd component of iso-spin. Indeed, it is easy to see that
<br /> I^{ 2 } V^{ \mu }_{ 3 } ( 0 ) | 0 \rangle = I_{ i } [ I_{ i } , V^{ \mu } ( 0 ) ] | 0 \rangle = \epsilon_{ i k 3 } \epsilon_{ i k l } V^{ \mu }_{ l } ( 0 ) | 0 \rangle = 2 V^{ \mu }_{ 3 } ( 0 ) | 0 \rangle .<br />
This means that V^{ \mu }_{ 3 } ( 0 ) | 0 \rangle is an eigenstate of I^{ 2 } with eigenvalue 1 ( 1 + 1 ) = 2, i.e. the iso-vector part of the hadronic em-current connects the vacuum to states with I = 1 , I_{ 3 } = 0.

I leave you to conclude that
<br /> I ( I + 1 ) \langle 0 | S^{ \mu } ( 0 ) | I , I_{ 3 } = 0 \rangle = 0 ,<br />
which means that the iso-scalar part of the em-current, only connects the vacuum to states of total iso-spin zero.
Good luck

Sam
 
Thanks for reply.

Why I3 is zero? What type of transitions should we understand? Why is there Delta?
 
Last edited:
LayMuon said:
Thanks for reply.

Why I3 is zero? What type of transitions should we understand? Why is there Delta?

I don’t understand what you mean by “what type of transitions”. I also don’t know how much you know about the subject. However, I can tell you what you need to know.
The Lagrangian of the quarks iso-doublet has three symmetries:

i) The invariance under a simultaneous phase change of the up and down quark fields, U_{ B } (1), given by

\delta \Psi = - i \alpha \Psi ,

leads to the conserved current

S^{ \mu } ( x ) = \bar{ \Psi } ( x ) \gamma^{ \mu } \Psi ( x ) ,

and to the constant charge

<br /> B = \int d^{ 3 } x \ S^{ 0 } ( x ) = \int d^{ 3 } x \ \left( u^{ \dagger } (x) u ( x ) + d^{ \dagger } ( x ) d ( x ) \right) ,<br />
which we call the Baryon Number.

ii) The invariance of the theory under iso-spin transformations, SU( 2 ),

\delta \Psi = - i \vec{ \beta } \cdot \frac{ \vec{ \tau } }{ 2 } \Psi ,

leads to the conserved isotopic spin current

\vec{ J }_{ \mu } ( x ) = \bar{ \Psi } ( x ) \gamma_{ \mu } \frac{ \vec{ \tau } }{ 2 } \Psi ( x ) .

Its associated constant charges (iso-vector) are given by

<br /> T^{ a } = \frac{ 1 }{ 2 } \int d^{ 3 } x \Psi^{ \dagger } ( x ) \tau^{ a } \Psi ( x ) .<br />

iii) The invariance under U_{ em } (1) transformation, given by,

<br /> \delta \Psi = - i \epsilon ( \frac{ I }{ 6 } + \frac{ \tau^{ 3 } }{ 2 } ) \Psi ,<br />

gives us the conserved electromagnetic current

J_{ em }^{ \mu } = \bar{ \Psi } \gamma^{ \mu } \left( \frac{ I }{ 6 } + \frac{ \tau^{ 3 } }{ 2 } \right) \Psi .

This can be written as

J_{ em }^{ \mu } ( x ) = \frac{ 1 }{ 6 } S^{ \mu } ( x ) + J^{ \mu }_{ 3 } ( x )

Integrating the time component of this current leads to the well-known relation

Q_{ em } = \frac{ B }{ 6 } + T_{ 3 } .

In order to study the collisions of hadrons, we need to know the properties of all possible intermediate states. Therefore, we are led to consider the matrix elements \langle 0 | J_{ em }^{ \mu } ( 0 ) | n \rangle, where | n \rangle is a set of ( small mass) intermediate states. From the properties of the vacuum, | 0 \rangle, and J_{em}^{ \mu } (under the above symmetries), we can prove the following properties of | n \rangle:

1) | n \rangle has zero electric charge and zero Baryon number.

2) | n \rangle is an eigenstate of the charge conjugation operator C, with eigenvalue C = - 1.

3) The total angular momentum and parity (J^{ P }) of | n \rangle is 1^{ - 1 }.

4) The total isotopic spin of | n \rangle, T, is either 0 or 1.

Try to prove these properties yourself. If you got stuck on any one, you can ask me for help.

Regards

Sam
 
Last edited:
thanks.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top