Understanding EM Fields: Storage and Transmission of Energy

  • Thread starter Thread starter spaghetti3451
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Em Energy Fields
AI Thread Summary
Electromagnetic (EM) fields indeed contain energy and can store it, as seen in capacitors, while also transmitting energy through waves. The distinction between storing and containing energy lies in the context of usage; storing refers to the ability to hold energy for later use, while containing refers to the presence of energy within the field itself. The definition provided describes an EM field as a configuration of electric fields that can be static or dynamic, which aligns with established principles. Additionally, a changing EM field induces a magnetic field, consistent with Maxwell's equations. This understanding is crucial for grasping the fundamental behaviors of EM fields in various applications.
spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31
I have been told that

1. EM fields contain energy.
2. EM fields can store energy, e.g. capacitors.
3. EM fields can transmit energy, e.g. via waves.

How are 1. and 2. any different from each other?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The two statements say the same thing using different words.
 
Thank you very much for your reply.

To move on, I just want your view on this definition of mine.

An electromagnetic field is an arbitrary configuration of electric fields (either finite or infinite in extent) that is either static or changing in time.

If the electromagnetic field changes in time, a magnetic field is induced whose properties and configurations are given by Maxwell's equations of electromgnetism.

Am I right?
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top