Understanding Energy (kinetic and potential)

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Addem
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Potential
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding energy concepts, specifically kinetic and potential energy, through two problems involving a falling mass system and a rocket launch scenario. Participants explore the implications of energy conservation and the definitions of initial and final energy states in these contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the conservation of energy in a system involving a 14kg mass and an 8kg mass, noting that calculations suggest energy is not conserved, despite the expectation that gravitational and tension forces should conserve energy.
  • Another participant suggests that energy is not conserved because the energy is transferred to the floor upon impact, creating waves and increasing atomic energy in the materials involved.
  • A different viewpoint asserts that energy is conserved up to the moment before the 14kg mass hits the floor, emphasizing that the system's total energy is conserved rather than the energy of each mass individually.
  • In the rocket launch problem, participants discuss the assertion that initial energy is zero at the Earth's surface, questioning the validity of this claim based on their understanding of kinetic and potential energy.
  • One participant clarifies that potential energy is negative at the Earth's surface and that escape velocity implies sufficient kinetic energy to reach a point where potential energy is zero, leading to a total energy of zero throughout the trajectory.
  • Another participant calculates that the 14kg mass gives up 686J of potential energy, which is transformed into the potential energy of the 8kg mass and the kinetic energy of both masses, indicating a complex interplay of energy forms.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the conservation of energy in the discussed scenarios, with no consensus reached on the interpretations of energy transfer and initial energy states. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of energy conservation in both problems.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding energy conservation principles, particularly regarding the definitions of initial and final energy states, and the effects of energy transfer during collisions.

Addem
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I have these two problems on energy where I just don't totally understand the explanations given. One goes:

(With a diagram showing a 14kg mass suspended 5m above the ground by a zero-mass rope, connected to a pulley, where on the other side of the rope is an 8kg mass resting on the ground. The rope is taut before the 14kg mass is released and the vector tension on each points straight up.)

"See the masses in Figure (1) which start out at rest. (i) Find the velocity of the 14kg mass just before it hits the ground. (ii) Find the maximum height reached by the 8kg (and don't worry about hitting the pulley). (iii) Find the fraction of mechanical energy left when the system finally comes to rest."

So with this one I can do the math, I just don't understand the conservation of energy principle here. Every force here is either a gravitational force or a tension force which is itself due to a gravitational force being transferred from one object to another. So I would think, here, that the energy would be conserved.

So like I said, I can do the math and see that the computations imply that the answer to part (iii) is less than 1 but I just don't get why, in light of conservation of energy. Can anyone explain to me why energy is not conserved here?

There is a second question,

"A rocket is launched at escape velocity from the surface of the Earth (radius R). What is its velocity when it is at a distance r from the center of the Earth in terms of G and M(of earth)?"

This one I very much don't understand, because when I read the solution it asserts that initial energy is 0. However, I would think that initial kinetic energy would be mv^2 / 2 and potential energy would be 0.

I've never totally understood energy and I'm not sure if that conceptual fogginess is responsible for why I'm not really getting these two problems. Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, technically when the mass hits the floor, it's energy is transferred into the floor. Everything is made of atoms, and when two objects collide, those atoms are given more energy individually. In fact, waves would be created in the floor/air, which is responsible for the fact that you would be able to hear it fall.

But really, energy here isn't conserved because you are artificially imposing zero motion, without considering the physical process in which it would occur.

For the second question:

The initial energy is zero, at the surface of the earth.
 
Addem said:
I have these two problems on energy where I just don't totally understand the explanations given. One goes:

(With a diagram showing a 14kg mass suspended 5m above the ground by a zero-mass rope, connected to a pulley, where on the other side of the rope is an 8kg mass resting on the ground. The rope is taut before the 14kg mass is released and the vector tension on each points straight up.)

"See the masses in Figure (1) which start out at rest. (i) Find the velocity of the 14kg mass just before it hits the ground. (ii) Find the maximum height reached by the 8kg (and don't worry about hitting the pulley). (iii) Find the fraction of mechanical energy left when the system finally comes to rest."

So with this one I can do the math, I just don't understand the conservation of energy principle here. Every force here is either a gravitational force or a tension force which is itself due to a gravitational force being transferred from one object to another. So I would think, here, that the energy would be conserved.

So like I said, I can do the math and see that the computations imply that the answer to part (iii) is less than 1 but I just don't get why, in light of conservation of energy. Can anyone explain to me why energy is not conserved here?
Energy is conserved up to an instant before the 14 kg mass hits the floor. But it is the energy of the system that is conserved, not the energy of each mass individually. Energy is transferred from the 14 kg. to the 8 kg mass.

There is a second question,

"A rocket is launched at escape velocity from the surface of the Earth (radius R). What is its velocity when it is at a distance r from the center of the Earth in terms of G and M(of earth)?"

This one I very much don't understand, because when I read the solution it asserts that initial energy is 0. However, I would think that initial kinetic energy would be mv^2 / 2 and potential energy would be 0.

I've never totally understood energy and I'm not sure if that conceptual fogginess is responsible for why I'm not really getting these two problems. Any help is appreciated.
Potential energy is negative at the surface of the earth. At infinite r, its potential energy is 0. Escape velocity means it has enough kinetic energy at the Earth surface to reach infinite r at which point is speed is 0 (0 KE). Since total energy does not change, its total energy everywhere from R to ∞ is 0.

AM
 
The 14kg mass falling through 5m 'gives up' 686J of PE.
This energy appears as PE of the 8kg mass rising by 5m + KE of 8kg mass + KE of the 14kg mass as it hits the ground
This last amount of KE is therefore not part of the total mechanical energy of the masses.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K