Understanding Enzymes: Error Bars, Substrate Drops, and Insulin Structure

  • Thread starter Thread starter faisal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Enzymes Error
AI Thread Summary
Error bars represent the variability of data, often calculated as standard deviation or standard error of the mean, and can be plotted using various graphing software. Small drops of substrate are used in enzyme activity experiments to prevent immediate saturation, allowing for a controlled reaction rate, which relates to Michaelis-Menten kinetics. Insulin is termed globular due to its compact, spherical shape despite having a quaternary structure, which is common in proteins. Enzyme specificity arises from their unique active sites rather than just their shape. The mass of the substrate can influence reaction rates, and measuring gas volume with precision helps in accurately determining reaction kinetics.
faisal
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
hello every 1,
i have a few questions
-i'd like to know what error bars are & how did i plot them on a graph?
-can some one please give me a scintific explanation to why small drops of substrate are introduced into a enzyme when trying to find its activity, all i know is that if all the substrate is added to the enzyme all at once, it will be immediately used up, small drops of substrate initiate the reaction but i don't know how?
why is insulin referred to as gobular when it has a quatenary structure?
and what makes an enzyme so specific, is it its spherical shape? or the nature of the enzyme to have only 1 functional region?
how do you calculate the rate of a reaction?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
These are very general questions, all of which you should have learned by now.

from what I remember, error bars refer tot he standard deviation of the y value; although there are variations to the concept.

for your second question, refer to the michaleis menton derivation, the equation actually depends on certain assumptions, you should become familiar with them.

especially the last two questions...what makes an enzyme specific, spherical shape, gobular-quaternary structure...come on and how do you not know how to calculate the rate of a reaction?

someone else here may be willing to regurgitate the fundamentals
 
GCT said:
These are very general questions, all of which you should have learned by now.

from what I remember, error bars refer tot he standard deviation of the y value; although there are variations to the concept.
Usually in the biological sciences, error bars refers to standard error of the mean, which is the standard deviation divided by the square root of the N. You can plot them easily in pretty much any software that does graphing, but without knowing what software is being used, I wouldn't know where to begin to suggest pointers of how to do that.

someone else here may be willing to regurgitate the fundamentals
Not until faisal shows some attempt at the answers first. :wink:
 
thanx for the info, i have another question how does the mass of the substrate affect the rate of the reaction?
whats the advantage of meassuring the volume of gas released from the rate of a reaction to +/-0.1cm3?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top