Classical Understanding Frames of Reference in Force and Motion for 10+2 Students

AI Thread Summary
Understanding frames of reference is crucial in the study of force and motion, particularly at the 10+2 level. While it's suggested that knowledge of frames may not be necessary initially, it is beneficial for a deeper comprehension of mechanics. There are two main types of reference frames: inertial (non-accelerating) and non-inertial (accelerating or rotating). In inertial frames, velocity terms are considered in interactions, which is relatively straightforward. However, non-inertial frames introduce fictitious forces, complicating the analysis. For those looking to explore this topic further, college-level textbooks often cover these concepts, especially regarding fictitious forces. Relativity, while related, can be set aside for now as it involves different considerations for reference frames.
rudransh verma
Gold Member
Messages
1,067
Reaction score
96
I was starting out some problems on force and motion at 10+2 level. I was told you don’t need to know about frame of reference. But I want to. So which books are there to understand frames? Is it a part of relativity? If yes then which books?
Thank you guys.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) accounting for different reference frames is different between classical mechanics and relativity. So ignore relativity for now.
2) There are two sorts of reference frames: accelerating/rotating (non-inertial) and non-accelerating (inertial)
3) Non-accelerating frames involve accounting for a velocity term in the various interections. Nothing too hard.
4) Acclerating/rotating frames add the complication of fictitious forces. Does your book mention them? If not, it is described in most college freshman texts.
 
Thanks @caz
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!

Similar threads

Back
Top